You are here

Archived: EJC Group Good

This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile

Inspection Summary

Overall summary & rating


Updated 1 March 2017

This announced inspection took place on the 3 and 6 February 2017. EJC Group provides personal care to people who live in their own homes in the community. At the time of our inspection the service was supporting 11 people.

There was a registered manager in post at the time of our inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People had care plans that were personalised to their individual needs and wishes. Records contained detailed information to assist care workers to provide care and support in an individualised manner that respected each person's individual requirements and promoted treating people with dignity.

Care records contained risk assessments and risk management plans to protect people from identified risks and helped to keep them safe but also enabled positive risk taking. They gave information for staff on the identified risk and informed staff on the measures to take to minimise any risks.

People were supported to take their medicines as prescribed. Records showed that medicines were obtained, stored, administered and disposed of safely. People were supported to maintain good health and had access to healthcare services when needed.

People told us that they felt cared for safely in their own home. Staff understood the need to protect people from harm and knew what action they should take if they had any concerns. Staff understood their role in caring for people with limited or no capacity under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

Staffing levels ensured that people received the support they required safely and at the times they needed. The recruitment practice protected people from being cared for by staff that were unsuitable to work in their home.

People received care from staff that were compassionate, friendly and kind and who would go the extra mile to support people and their families. Staff had the skills and knowledge to provide the care and support people needed and were supported by a management team which was receptive to ideas and committed to providing a high standard of care.

There were systems in place to monitor the quality of the service provided. Staff and people were confident that issues would be addressed and that any concerns they had would be listened to.

Inspection areas



Updated 1 March 2017

The service was safe.

People told us that they felt safe in their home with the staff that cared for them and staff understood their responsibilities to ensure people were kept safe.

Risk assessments were in place and managed in a way which ensured people received safe support and remained as independent as possible.

Safe recruitment practices were in place and staffing levels ensured that people�s care and support needs were safely met.

There were systems in place to manage medicines in a safe way and people were supported to take their prescribed medicines.



Updated 1 March 2017

The service was effective.

People were actively involved in decisions about their care and support needs. Staff demonstrated their understanding of the Mental Capacity Act, 2005 (MCA).

People received personalised care and support. Staff received training to ensure they had the skills and knowledge to support people appropriately and in the way that they preferred.

People were supported to access relevant health and social care professionals to ensure they received the care and support they needed.



Updated 1 March 2017

The service was caring.

People were encouraged to make decisions about how their support was provided and their privacy and dignity was protected and promoted.

Staff had a good understanding of people�s needs and preferences.

Staff promoted peoples independence to ensure people were as involved and in control of their lives as possible.



Updated 1 March 2017

The service was responsive.

People were listened to, their views were acknowledged and acted upon and care and support was delivered in the way that people chose and preferred.

People using the service and their relatives knew how to raise a concern or make a complaint and were confident any issues would be addressed.



Updated 1 March 2017

The service was well-led.

People and staff were confident in the management team. They were supported and encouraged to provide feedback about the service and it was used to drive continuous improvement.

There were systems in place to monitor the quality and safety of the service and actions were completed in a timely manner.

The manager monitored the quality and culture of the service and strived to lead a service which supported people to live as independent a life as possible.