• Dentist
  • Dentist

The Coach House

24 Bakewell Street, Penkhull, Stoke On Trent, Staffordshire, ST4 5HJ (01782) 844907

Provided and run by:
Mr James McCubbin

All Inspections

1 November 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a follow up focused inspection of The Coach House on 1 November 2022. This inspection was carried out to review in detail the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements.

The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

We had previously undertaken a focused inspection of The Coach House on 4 May 2022 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found the registered provider was not providing safe, effective or well-led care and was in breach of regulations 12 and 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for The Coach House dental practice on our website www.cqc.org.uk.

When one or more of the five questions are not met, we require the service to make improvements and send us an action plan. We then inspect again after a reasonable interval, focusing on the areas where improvement was required.

As part of this inspection we asked:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made some improvements in relation to the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 4 May 2022 however there were areas in which the practice still needed to make improvements.

Are services effective?

We found this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 4 May 2022.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 4 May 2022.

Background

The provider has 1 practice and this report is about The Coach House.

The Coach House is in Stoke and provides private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There is level access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces, including dedicated parking for people with disabilities are available near the practice.

The dental team includes 1 dentist and 1 dental nurse/receptionist. The practice has 1 treatment room.

During the inspection we spoke with 1 dentist and 1 dental nurse/receptionist. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Tuesday to Friday, 9am to 4pm, closing between 1pm and 2pm for lunch.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Take action to ensure the availability of equipment in the practice to manage medical emergencies taking into account the guidelines issued by the Resuscitation Council (UK) and the General Dental Council.

  • Take action to ensure the clinicians take into account the guidelines issued by the Department of Health publication ‘Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention’ when promoting the maintenance of good oral health and ensure this is recorded in all patient notes.

4 May 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out this announced focused inspection on 4 May 2022 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered practice was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission, (CQC), inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we usually ask five key questions, however due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and to reduce time spent on site, only the following three questions were asked:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

  • The dental clinic was visibly clean and well-maintained.
  • The practice had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance but these were not always followed.
  • Staff knew how to deal with medical emergencies but appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were not always available.
  • The practice did not have systems to help them manage risk to patients and staff, they carried out a recent fire risk assessment in January 2022 but we saw no evidence that any other risk assessments were completed.
  • Safeguarding processes required improvement as the safeguarding lead had not completed safeguarding training and no safeguarding policy was in place.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Patients were treated with dignity and respect and staff always took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • There was no effective leadership or culture of continuous improvement.
  • Staff and patients were not asked for feedback about the services provided.
  • Complaints were dealt with positively and efficiently.
  • The dental clinic had information governance arrangements which required improvement.

Background

The provider has one practice and this report is about The Coach House. The Coach House is in Stoke and provides private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There is level access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces are available near the practice on a nearby road.

The dental team includes one dentist and one dental nurse/receptionist. The practice has one treatment room.

During the inspection we spoke with one dentist and one dental nurse. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Tuesday to Friday, 9am to 4pm, closing between 1pm and 2pm for lunch.

We identified regulations the provider was not complying with. They must:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.

  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Implement an effective system for identifying, disposing and replenishing of out-of-date stock.

Full details of the regulations the provider was not meeting are at the end of this report.

31 July 2014

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out this inspection to follow up on two areas which required improvement following the last inspection. We spoke with staff, checked equipment and looked at records relating to staff training and monitoring of quality.

We found that the provider had appropriate systems in place to demonstrate that staff were suitably trained and qualified to do their job.

We saw evidence of an effective system to regularly assess and monitor the quality of the service that patients received.

22 July and 20 August 2013

During a routine inspection

This inspection was completed over two days. We inspected the service on the 22nd July 2013 but the provider became uncooperative with us. The provider received a letter from us informing them that their behaviour was unacceptable, and we re-inspected the service on 20th August 2013 accompanied by a specialist dental advisor.

During our inspection, we spoke with four people who used the service, a dental nurse and the dentist, who was also the registered manager and provider of the service.

People told us they were involved in the planning of their care and were treated with care and respect.

People told us they were happy with the care and treatment they received. One person said, 'It's quality dentistry here. Without this dentist, my teeth would not be as good as they are'. Another person said, 'I'm very happy with my care'.

Systems were in place to reduce the risk of infection, but we found that some best practice guidance to reduce the risks of infection was not being followed.

We were unable to confirm that all the staff working at the service were suitably trained to meet people's needs. This was because the provider did not have a system in place to evidence the training the staff had completed.

Effective systems were not in place to enable the provider to consistently assess and monitor the quality of the service they provided.