• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Kings Court Care Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Kent Road, Swindon, Wiltshire, SN1 3NP (01793) 715480

Provided and run by:
Lifestyle Care Management Ltd

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile
Important: The provider of this service changed - see old profile

All Inspections

12 December 2016

During a routine inspection

We inspected this service on 12 and 14 December 2016. Kings Court Care Centre provides accommodation and nursing care for up to 60 older people. The service comprises of two floors; ground floor general nursing unit and the top floor for people living with dementia. At the time of our visit 54 people were using the service.

There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People told us they felt safe at the service. Staff we spoke with understood the appropriate procedure that they would take if they suspected any concerns around people's safety. There were sufficient numbers of staff on each shift to meet people’s needs. Staff records demonstrated the registered manager followed safe recruitment procedures to ensure staff were suitable to work at the home. Staff received appropriate support through induction, training and supervision. Staff we spoke with said they felt able to speak with the management at any time.

People received their medicines as prescribed. Medicines were administered and recorded appropriately. However, we found one medicine was not stored securely. Risks to people’s well-being had been identified, recorded and measures had been put in place to protect people. However, one person was at risk but no action had been taken to manage this risk. We raised this with staff who took immediate action.

People were supported to maintain a balanced diet. People were also supported to access health care professionals when required and their advice was followed.

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) is required by law to monitor the operation of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) and report on what we find. Staff and the registered manager understood the MCA and DoLS and the provider followed the legal requirements. The provider had identified through their own internal audits the MCA decision specific assessment was not always clearly documented. There was an action plan in place that specified that the documentation for specific decisions was going to be in place by February 2017.

People were cared for by compassionate staff that enjoyed working with people. The staff treated people with dignity and respect. People were involved in decisions about their support. There were a range of activities on offer for people to participate in if they chose to do so. This included both group and individual activities.

The registered manager ensured quality assurance systems were in place to monitor the quality of care provided and drive improvements within the service. The registered manager and staff promoted open and transparent culture.

1 December 2015

During a routine inspection

We inspected this service on 1 December 2015, shortly after it was registered with the new provider. This inspection was unannounced. Kings Court Care Centre provides care for up to 60 older people requiring nursing or personal care. On the day of our inspection 33 people were living at the service.

There was a new registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the CQC to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People felt safe living at Kings Court. People’s relatives told us they felt the service was safe. Staff were aware of their responsibilities in keeping people safe from harm.

People were protected against the risks associated with the use and management of medicines. The environment was safe. The service was clean and people were protected by effective infection control procedures.

There were enough staff to meet people’s needs. People were assisted promptly and with no unnecessary delay. Staff and people told us there were sufficient numbers of staff on duty.

People’s care needs were met and the home had a calm and relaxing atmosphere. However, staff did not always interact with people in a meaningful way. There were occasions when the staff had missed an opportunity to interact with people. We have therefore identified this as an area of a training need that required improvement.

People were happy with the food provided. People were supported to eat and drink enough to meet their nutritional and hydration needs. The chef was knowledgeable about people’s individual nutritional needs.

People were cared for by staff that felt confident in their roles and felt supported. The registered manager and staff were aware of their responsibilities under the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005 and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). The MCA is the legal framework that protects people’s right to make their own choices. DoLS are in place to ensure that people liberty is not unlawfully restricted and where it is, that it is the least restrictive practice.

People were supported by staff who respected their privacy and dignity and promoted their independence. Staff spoke about the people they cared for in a professional manner and were knowledgeable about people’s needs.

People’s care documentation provided the details staff required to enable them to meet people’s individual health needs. However, the quality of information recorded surrounding people’s personalised choice of activities and interests was not satisfactory. People’s experience of activities and social stimulation needed to be improved.

The people we spoke with said they had no complaints about the service, and would feel comfortable speaking to staff if they had any concerns. The registered manager ensured when complaints had been raised these had been investigated and resolved promptly.

People spoke positively about the management. The registered manager was aware of the improvements required to the service. They undertook quality assurance reviews to measure and monitor the standard of the service and drive improvement.