• Care Home
  • Care home

Silversprings

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

12 Rosslyn Road, Watford, Hertfordshire, WD18 0JY

Provided and run by:
Silversprings RCH Ltd

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 4 May 2019

The inspection: We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

Inspection team: The inspection team consisted an inspector and an expert by experience. An expert by experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service.

Service and service type: Silversprings is a 'care home'. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as single package under one contractual agreement CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection.

The service has been developed and designed in line with the principles and values that underpin

Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. This ensures that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes. The principles reflect the need for people with learning disabilities and/or autism to live meaningful lives that include control, choice, and independence.

There was a registered manager in post at the time of our visit. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. The registered manager was also the director of the company who owns the service. This person has been referred to as the provider throughout this report.

Notice of inspection: This inspection was announced. We gave the provider under 24 hours notice that we would be visiting because it is a small service and we needed to be sure someone would be at home.

What we did: Before the inspection we reviewed the information we held about the service and the service provider. We looked at the notifications we had received for this service. Notifications are information about important events the service is required to send us by law.

During the inspection, we met four of the people who lived at the service, however due to some people having complex communication styles we were unable to obtain verbal feedback from everybody. We observed how people were being cared for and supported. We also met and spoke with three support staff. We spent time with the provider during our visit and spoke to two of the relatives of people who lived at the service.

We looked at records used by the provider for managing the service. These included the online support plans and records for people, staff training and support records, records of quality monitoring and audits, information about medicines and we inspected the environment.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 4 May 2019

About the service: Silversprings provides accommodation and care for up to nine people with a learning disability and/or autism within a large detached property. At the time of our inspection there were nine people using the service.

The provider and staff were working within the principles and values that underpin Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. This ensured that people could live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes. The principles reflect the need for people with learning disabilities and/or autism to live meaningful lives that include control, choice, and independence.

People’s experience of using this service:

¿ People’s relatives felt their family members were safe and well cared for. Staff demonstrated a good understanding of the risks people faced in their day to day lives and the ways they could support them to minimise those risks.

¿ People were supported by sufficient numbers of staff.

¿ People’s medicines were managed safely. The processes in place ensured that the administration and handling of medicines was suitable for the people who used the service.

¿ Effective infection control measures were in place to protect people.

¿ People were supported by staff who understood the importance of respecting their choices and providing the support required whilst promoting and maintaining people’s independence. This enabled people to achieve positive outcomes and promoted a good quality of life.

¿ People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

¿ The provider was respected by the staff and promoted an open and transparent culture. The provider and staff understood their roles and responsibilities.

Rating at last inspection: The service was rated ‘Good’ at our last inspection. The report following that inspection was published on 19 April 2016.

Why we inspected: This was a planned inspection based on the rating at the last inspection.

Follow up: We will continue to monitor intelligence we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If any concerning information is received we may inspect sooner.