• Dentist
  • Dentist

Archived: Bright Dental Surgery

33, Chobham Road, Woking, Surrey, GU21 6JD (01483) 720240

Provided and run by:
Bright DS Limited

All Inspections

17 March 2017

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection on 17 March 2017 to ask the practice the following key questions; Are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Bright Dental Surgery is based close to Woking centre in Surrey and provides NHS and private treatment to adults and children. The practice offers a range of general dental treatment. The premises are located on the ground floor and consist of three dental treatment rooms, a reception and waiting area and a separate decontamination area.

People using a wheelchair, pushchair or walking aids can access the practice through step free access. Pay and display car parking spaces are available near the practice.

The staff at the practice consists of a principal dentist (who is the responsible person), two associate dentists, a dental hygienist, two trainee dental nurses and two receptionists.

The principal dentist is the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the practice is run.

Our key findings were:

  • There was an induction programme for staff to follow which ensured they were skilled and competent in delivering safe and effective care and support to patients.
  • The practice ensured staff maintained the necessary skills and competence to support the needs of patients.
  • There were effective systems in place to reduce the risk and spread of infection. We found the treatment rooms and equipment were visibly clean.
  • There were systems in place to check equipment had been serviced regularly, including the dental air compressor, autoclaves, fire extinguishers and the X-ray equipment.
  • We found the dentists regularly assessed each patient’s gum health and the dentist took X-rays at appropriate intervals.
  • The practice kept up to date with current guidelines when considering the care and treatment needs of patients.
  • The practice placed an emphasis on the promotion of oral and general health and the prevention of dental disease. Appropriate information and advice was available according to patients’ individual needs.
  • Staff had been trained to handle emergencies and appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were readily available.
  • Patients received assessments of their oral health needs. They were given clear explanations about their proposed treatment, and its costs, benefits and risks and were involved in making decisions about it.
  • Patients were treated with dignity and respect and confidentiality was maintained.
  • The appointment system met the needs of patients and waiting times were kept to a minimum.
  • There was an effective complaints system and the practice was open and transparent with patients if a mistake had been made.
  • Staff demonstrated knowledge of the practice whistleblowing policy and were confident they would raise a concern about another staff member’s performance if it was necessary.
  • There was an effective system in place to act on feedback received from patients and staff.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements and should:

  • Review the practice’s risk assessments and ensure sharps handling procedures and protocols are in compliance with the Health and Safety (Sharp Instruments in Healthcare) Regulations 2013.

19 March 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with three patients after they had received treatment on the day of our visit. All three of these patients were happy overall with the treatment they had received over the time they had been attending the practice. One commented that the, "Staff were very polite and courteous" and "Always exceed my expectations." Where appropriate they had been given treatment options and the information they needed to be able to make their choice. They felt that their decisions and opinions were respected by the staff.

We found that people were given appropriate information about their treatment. Information was collected and updated about patient's medical conditions to ensure patients remained safe when being treated. Equipment was available and staff trained to deal with medical and other foreseeable emergencies. There were effective systems in place to reduce the risk and spread of infection except that an infection control audit was overdue. There was a commitment by all staff to remaining appropriately trained.

Records were stored securely. The patients records we saw were accurate and fit for purpose however the provider had not undertaken a recent audit.