• Dentist
  • Dentist

Capital Dental

62 Tudor Road, Hampton, Middlesex, TW12 2NF (020) 8941 3383

Provided and run by:
Dr. Sandeep Luthra

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

We carried out this announced on-site inspection on 5 August 2026.

We found the practice had met regulations.

The practice had effective systems to identify and manage risks, including infection prevention and control.

Staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to carry out their roles.

Recruitment procedures reflected current legislation and there was effective leadership and a culture of continuous improvement.

Staff provided care and treatment in line with current guidance. They treated patients with dignity and respect and ensured access to care, support, and treatment when required.

 

The practice is in the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and provides private dental care and treatment for adults.

There was step-free access to the practice and car parking spaces available, including dedicated parking for disabled people, near the practice.

The practice had 2 treatment rooms. At the time of our inspection, there was a total of 6 staff, of which there were 2 dentists, 2 trainee dental nurses, 1 dental hygienist, and the practice manager who was a registered dental nurse. We gathered feedback from staff and spoke to a range of staff during our inspection, including the principal dentist, 1 trainee dental nurse, and the practice manager.

29 January 2013

During a routine inspection

People using the service said that they were satisfied with it and way it was provided. "I feel like a person as well as a patient'". "The white marble floor and white walls gave a good clinical feel". They had the consultation procedure, fees and treatments explained to them, that included any risks attached to treatments. They told us they were treated with dignity and respect by staff and felt safe using the service.

They did not comment on infection control but did tell us they thought the practice was kept clean, tidy and they were seen in private.

We saw there was sufficient information given so that people could decide what treatment they wanted and if they wanted it to go ahead. This included cost. There was a system in place to minimise the risk of infection and cross contamination of instruments. Staff were knowledgeable, qualified and competent to deliver the service people needed. People using the service also had access to a complaints procedure that was included in the information provided. Records were also well maintained, up to date and accessible.