• Dentist
  • Dentist

Archived: Alan Jones Dental Surgery

36 Newbegin, Hornsea, Humberside, HU18 1AD (01964) 532153

Provided and run by:
Mr Alan Jones

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

10 November 2015

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection on 10 November 2015 to ask the practice the following key questions; Are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was not providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations

Background

Alan Jones Dental Surgery is located in the seaside town of Hornsea, in the East Riding of Yorkshire. The premises are situated in the town centre, close to car parking facilities. The practice provides a service to private patients.

The practice is open:

Monday - Wednesday 08:30 - 17:30

Thursday 09:00 - 16:30

Friday 08:30 - 14:00

CQC previously inspected the practice on 22 May 2013 and 2 October 2013 and asked the provider to make improvements regarding the care and welfare of people who use the service, infection prevention and control and to monitor the quality of service provisions. We checked these areas as part of this comprehensive inspection and found this had not been embedded in the practice.

The practice owner is the registered provider. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the practice is run.

During the inspection we spoke to four patients who used the service. We sent CQC comment cards to the practice two weeks prior to our visit for patients to tell us what they thought about the practice. We did not receive any written CQC comment cards and observed the cards and the box at the reception area. However all the comments were positive about the staff and the services provided. Comments included: the practice was safe and hygienic; staff were very caring and polite and they were impressed with the services.

Our key findings were:

  • The practice did not have emergency medicines in line with the British National Formulary (BNF) guidance for medical emergencies in dental practice.
  • The practice did not have access to an automated external defibrillator and the medical oxygen cylinder available on the premises had no supporting evidence that it had been serviced or replaced.
  • Governance arrangements were in not place for the smooth running of the practice; the practice did not have a structured plan in place to audit quality and safety including infection control, radiographs and patient care records.
  • Staff had not received safeguarding training, however they knew how to recognise signs of abuse but not how or who to report it to.
  • A legionella risk assessment had had not been completed.
  • Staff had been trained to manage medical emergencies, however this training was completed in November 2013.

We identified regulations that were not being met and the provider must:

  • Ensure availability and checks of all medicines and equipment to manage medical emergencies giving due regard to guidelines issued by the British National Formulary, the Resuscitation Council (UK).
  • Ensure the practice's recruitment policy and procedures are suitable and the recruitment arrangements are in line with Schedule 3 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 to ensure necessary employment checks are in place for all staff and the required specified information in respect of persons employed by the practice is held.
  • Ensure the practice’s protocols are reviewed for recording in the patients’ dental care records or elsewhere the reason for taking the X-ray and quality of the X-ray giving due regard to the Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulation (IR(ME)R) 2000.
  • Ensure audits of various aspects of the service, such as radiography and dental care records, are undertaken at regular intervals to help improve the quality of service. The practice should also ensure all audits have documented learning points so the resulting improvements can be demonstrated.
  • Review its audit protocols to document learning points that are shared with all relevant staff and ensure that the resulting improvements can be demonstrated as part of the audit process.
  • Ensure that the practice is compliant with its legal obligations under Ionising Radiation Regulations (IRR) 99 and Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulation (IRMER) 2000.
  • Ensure a risk assessment for legionella testing is completed and action plan implemented in accordance with the findings.
  • Ensure all staff have CPR and medical emergency training.
  • Ensure all staff receive necessary training and performance appraisals and are suitably supported in undertaking their activities.

You can see full details of the regulations not being met at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements and should:

  • Adopt an individual risk based approach to patient recalls having regard to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines.
  • Review the practice protocols and procedures for promoting the maintenance of good oral health giving due regard to guidelines issued by the Department of Health publication ‘Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention.
  • Review at appropriate intervals the training, learning and development needs of individual staff members and have an effective process established for the on-going assessment and supervision of all staff.
  • Maintain accurate, complete and detailed records relating to employment of staff. This includes making appropriate notes of verbal reference taken and ensuring recruitment checks, including references, are suitably obtained and recorded.
  • Review the practice’s sharps procedures giving due regard to the Health and Safety (Sharp Instruments in Healthcare) Regulations 2013.
  • Review staff awareness of the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005 and ensure all staff are aware of their responsibilities under the Act as it relates to their role.
  • Establish and operate effectively an accessible system for identifying, receiving, recording, handling and responding to complaints by service users also ensure this is easily accessible to patients.
  • Review the storage of dental care records to ensure they are stored securely.
  • Review the practice's recruitment policy and procedures to ensure character references for new staff as well as proof of identification are requested and recorded suitably.

2 October 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

At the last inspection of the practice in May 2013, we made compliance actions in respect of outcome 4: Care and welfare of people who use services, outcome 8:Cleanliness and infection control and outcome 16: Assessing and monitoring the quality of service provision. At this inspection we found that improvements had been made and that the practice was now compliant with the outcomes we assessed.

We checked a sample of patient records and saw that they all included an up to date medical history for the patient. The dentist had obtained a supply of the medicines that were expected to be in place in a dental practice.

The decontamination room had been tidied and 'clean' and 'dirty' areas were clearly identified. There were two bowls in place; one for cleaning instruments and one for rinsing instruments. A light magnifier had been purchased and had been used as part of the decontamination process for instruments. Instruments that had been cleaned and were to be stored for future use had been bagged and dated. Cleaning schedules and colour coding cleaning equipment had been introduced. There were appropriate policies and procedures in place for the control of infection.

A quality survey had been produced and it was on display in the reception area. Information about the complaints system was also on display. Policies and procedures had been updated or were in the process of being updated.

23 May 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with the dentist and practice receptionist on the day of the inspection and spoke with the dental nurse and four patients on the day following the inspection.

Patients that we spoke with expressed satisfaction with the service they received. One person said, 'I have received absolutely fantastic treatment'. Patients said that the dentist explained their options for treatment and that they verbally consented to the treatment they had decided on.

Medical histories were obtained for each patient and any changes were discussed at each visit to the dentist. However, medical histories were not updated regularly. Emergency medication was not available at the surgery as outlined in current guidelines apart from medication to treat anaphylaxis shock and routine medication stored in a first aid box.

The premises were on the ground level so were easily accessible for people with mobility problems.

We found the premises to be clean and hygienic on the day of the inspection. However, the current guidelines for the cleaning of instruments were not being followed and this could have placed patients at risk of infection.

Staff had undertaken appropriate training and the dental nurse told us that she was well supported by the dentist.

The arrangements in place to assess the quality of the service provided were inadequate and did not encourage people to make comments and suggestions that would have allowed the practice to improve.