Archived: Plan Care Aylesbury

Redstone Business Centre, Walton Street, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, HP21 7AY (01296) 468520

Provided and run by:
Taylor Gordon & Co. Limited

All Inspections

29 October 2012

During a routine inspection

Some of the people we spoke with compared their experience of the service in 2012 with that in 2011. People who had used the service from 2011 told us it had improved considerably over the course of 2012. People were now experiencing a more consistent service. This was particularly so with their 'regular carer'. People valued the relationship they had with their regular care worker. The care worker generally turned up on time, treated them with respect, maintained their dignity, completed the work agreed, and generally did so to a good standard.

Two people expressed frustration at the lack of flexibility when a new care worker took over or when things changed - such as when they felt they needed more time or when they would benefit from some flexibility with the order of tasks carried out on a particular session. A relative stressed the importance of continuity of care worker to families as well.

We found people's needs were assessed and their care was provided in line with their care plan. People were protected against the risk of abuse. Staff supported people in the administration of medicines. Staff were supported in providing care and support to people. There was a system in place to assess and monitor the quality of the care people were receiving.

30 January 2012

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We received mixed accounts of people's experience of the agency.

One person told us 'It's very hit and miss. They either arrive very early or too late.' We were told by that person that the agency had missed calls in the past but not recently.

Another person said they felt things had not improved. The main problems were a lack of consistent carers. They had children and didn't want lots of strangers visiting the house. They said they had complained about this so much they were now fed up with complaining as nothing changed. 'The carers were more than often late and the office rarely let me know if carers were going to be late.'

One relative told us that their relative's preferred time for care was 7am. They said carers were usually late and the office didn't inform them. We were told that on one occasion the carer didn't arrive until 10am.

We were told that 'some carers will 'read the book' (care plan) and therefore knew what to do. Others didn't 'read the book' and had to be told what to do.

One person said they were not happy with the service and would like to change to another agency so they could get a more reliable service.

Four people informed us that If a carer was going to be late they would usually let them know.

They told us that, compared with earlier experience with the service it was a lot easier to contact the office now.

A person we spoke with told us that an assessor had visited and talked to them about the care they needed, and how they wanted that to be done. 'We were kept informed about all the care needs my relative wanted and it's all recorded in the book.'

22 November 2011

During an inspection looking at part of the service

People told us that the care workers were very good; they provided a good level of care and were always willing to help. However, they said the organisation was disorganised and people told us they had received late or missed call, had no consistent care staff and communication with the office was poor.

We were told that people were not always notified in advance when a care worker was going to be late.

People told us that when staff were with them, providing care, they were being constantly harassed by the office to take on extra calls. They told us that the care staff were 'run ragged'.

We were told by one relative that they had been left for six weeks with no care when their relative had been discharged from hospital. They said that two carers were needed to provide care but only one carer would usually turn up.

We were told that it was difficult to contact staff in the office or at weekends.

One relative said 'whenever I call the office to query where the carer is they always say they will get back to me, but they never do.'

People we spoke to expressed a lack of confidence in the agency to maintain improvements following a complaint.

10 November 2012

During an inspection in response to concerns

Many people told us of their poor experience with the agency soon after it started to provide a service. The service was said to have improved in recent months.

People told us of poor timekeeping (mostly care workers arriving late, but sometimes early as well), high turnover of care staff, uneven standards of care, poor communications with the office, and on occasions a care worker of the wrong gender being sent.

We also heard from people who said that they were very satisfied with the service they were receiving and had never had cause to complain.

A number of people stressed that their dissatisfaction was with the managers and the office of the agency and not with their own care worker.