• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Hasbury Home Care Services Limited

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

154 Middleton Hall Road, Kings Norton, Birmingham, West Midlands, B30 1DN (0121) 459 2234

Provided and run by:
Hasbury Home Care Services Ltd

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 24 September 2019

The inspection

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

Inspection team

The inspection was carried out by one inspector and an Expert by Experience. An Expert by Experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service.

Service and service type

This service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own houses and flats.

This service provides care and support to people living in five ‘supported living’ settings, so that they can live as independently as possible. People’s care and housing are provided under separate contractual agreements. CQC does not regulate premises used for supported living; this inspection looked at people’s personal care and support.

The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.

Notice of inspection

We gave the service 48 hours’ notice of the inspection. This was because we needed to be sure that the provider or registered manager would be in the office to support the inspection.

Inspection activity started on 21 August and ended on 22 August 2019. We visited the office location on 21 August and visited people, with their consent, in their own homes on the 22 August.

What we did before the inspection

We used the information the provider sent us in the provider information return. This is information providers are required to send us with key information about their service, what they do well, and improvements they plan to make. This information helps support our inspections. We reviewed information we had received about the service since the last inspection. We sought feedback from the Local Authority, professionals who work with the service and Healthwatch. Healthwatch is an independent consumer champion that gathers and represents the views of the public about health and social care services in England. This information helps support our inspections. We used all of this information to plan our inspection.

During the inspection

We spoke with eight people who used the service, three relatives and met six people in their homes to seek their views about their experiences of the care provided. We spoke with five care staff, the registered manager, the deputy manager and nominated individual. The nominated individual is responsible for supervising the management of the service and was also the provider.

We reviewed a range of records. This included five people’s care records and medication records. We looked at four staff files in relation to recruitment and staff supervision. A variety of records relating to the management of the service, including policies and procedures were reviewed.

After the inspection

We continued to seek clarification from the provider to validate evidence found and we looked at training data.

Overall inspection

Requires improvement

Updated 24 September 2019

About the service

Hasbury Home Care Services Limited is a domiciliary care agency providing personal care and support to 55 people living in their own homes. The service also provided support to people living in five supported living schemes. Four of the houses, people shared facilities from two to four people and one house was single occupation. Three of the houses had staff on site 24 hours a day.

Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is to help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

The provider monitored the service to ensure it continued to provide a good quality care. However, quality monitoring audits had not identified the issues we found during the inspection.

All the people, relatives, and staff we spoke with said the service provided good quality care. The culture of the service was open and honest and the provider, registered manager and staff were approachable.

Staff were knowledgeable and kind. People had regular staff who they got to know well. People and relatives told us how friendly and caring the staff were. Staff enjoyed their work and got on well with the people they supported who they valued and treated with dignity.

Staff provided responsive and flexible care to people in line with their preferences and choices. The staff team were multilingual and communicated with people in English and a range of other languages, as required. If people communicated non-verbally staff knew how to engage with them.

People were safe using the service. Staff knew how to protect people from harm and reduce the risk of accidents and incidents. The service was sufficiently staffed to ensure people's needs were met. Staff supported people with their medicines and this was done safely. Staff understood how to prevent and control the spread of infection.

People were assessed before using the service to ensure their needs could be met. Assessments addressed people's physical and mental health needs, their cultural and language needs, and what was important to them. Staff worked with GPs, district nurses, and other health and social care professionals to ensure people's health and social care needs were met.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was good (published 30 December 2016).

Why we inspected

This was a planned inspection based on the previous rating.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.