• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Your Life (Northwich)

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Marbury Court, Northwich Marina, Chester Way, Northwich, CW9 5FQ (01606) 352140

Provided and run by:
Yourlife Management Services Limited

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

About the service

Your Life (Northwich) is a domiciliary care service providing the regulated activity of personal care to people living independently within a retirement living development. The service supports older adults with a range of needs, including physical health conditions, mobility difficulties, sensory impairments and long-term health conditions, enabling people to remain living in their own homes with support tailored to their individual needs, preferences and goals. At the time of this assessment, the service was providing personal care and support to 3 people.

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) regulates the personal care and support that people may receive. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where people receive personal care, we also consider any wider social care provided.

Who the service is for

This service is registered to support older adults aged 65 and over, and adults aged 18 to 65 with physical disabilities and sensory impairments. The service provides personal care and support to people living independently within a retirement living development.

Our view of the service

Our assessment was carried out remotely between 21 September 2026 and 2 October 2026 as part of a Return to Good assessment.

Overall, the evidence reviewed demonstrated people were receiving safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led support which reflected their individual needs, preferences and circumstances. Care plans, risk assessments and support records were personalised and provided staff with clear guidance on how to support people safely whilst promoting independence, choice and control. Records showed people's needs were regularly reviewed and care was adapted when changes in health, wellbeing or circumstances were identified.

The provider adopted a person-centred approach to care delivery and promoted people's independence wherever possible. Care records demonstrated a focus on what people could do for themselves and how staff could provide support in a way that maintained dignity, choice and control. There was evidence people and, where appropriate, their relatives were involved in decisions about their care and support and consent was obtained and reviewed in line with people's wishes.

People benefited from opportunities to maintain social connections, participate in meaningful activities and remain involved within their local community. Activity programmes showed a varied range of events and social opportunities, including exercise sessions, games evenings, knitting groups, film nights, social gatherings, fundraising activities and homeowners' meetings. These opportunities supported people's wellbeing, interests and community involvement and helped reduce the risk of social isolation.

The provider had systems and processes in place to monitor the quality and safety of care. Audits, care reviews, staff file audits and operational oversight processes were completed regularly to assess performance and identify opportunities for improvement. Where actions had been identified, records demonstrated they were monitored and completed. Governance arrangements provided oversight of care delivery, staffing, training, incidents and documentation and supported continuous improvement across the service.

There was evidence of a positive culture where learning, accountability and improvement were promoted. Staff received training, competency assessments, supervision and ongoing development opportunities. Team meetings covered topics including communication, record keeping, safeguarding, incident reporting, fire safety, end of life care and learning from events. Staff achievements were recognised and opportunities were provided for reflection and learning to support improvements in practice.

Staff spoke positively about the registered manager, describing them as approachable, supportive and responsive. Feedback highlighted the registered manager's commitment to improving the service and supporting both people and staff. Evidence demonstrated they maintained effective oversight of care delivery through audits, reviews, quality assurance processes and regular engagement with staff. The registered manager promoted a culture of learning and continuous improvement, with lessons from audits, incidents, reviews and feedback used to drive service improvements and support positive outcomes for people. Staff consistently described the registered manager as visible, supportive and committed to maintaining high standards of care and support.

Overall, the evidence reviewed provided assurance people were receiving good quality care and support.

21 November 2018

During a routine inspection

We undertook this inspection of Your Life Northwich on the 21st and 23rd of November 2018. Both visits were announced.

This was the first inspection of the service since its registration in 2015.

This service provides care and support to people living in specialist ‘extra care’ housing. Extra care housing is purpose-built or adapted single household accommodation in a shared site or building. The accommodation is rented, and is the occupant’s own home. People’s care and housing are provided under separate contractual agreements. CQC does not regulate premises used for extra care housing; this inspection looked at people’s personal care and support service.

People who used this service lived in their own apartments with access to communal areas, for example an activities room and restaurant.

Not everyone who used the service received the regulated activity; CQC only inspects the service being received by people provided with ‘personal care’; for example, help with tasks related to personal hygiene, or medication. Where they do we also take into account any wider social care provided. At the time of our inspection there were six people receiving the personal care service.

There was a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. The registered manager was present on both days of our visits.

People felt safe with the staff team and staff demonstrated knowledge about the types of potential abuse that could occur and how these could be reported. Medication management was robust.

New staff recruited to the service underwent appropriate checks to ensure they were suitable to work with vulnerable adults. Sufficient staff were employed to meet people’s needs.

Risk assessments were in place to protect people. These related to the hazards they faced while they were being supported as well as general risks posed by the environment. Accidents and incidents were recorded and analysed to prevent future occurrence.

The registered provider reflected on its care practice to ensure that lessons learned were embedded into future care practice.

Staff received the training and supervision they needed to perform their role.

While no-one was supported with nutritional needs; the registered provider was mindful of future changes that could occur and included these in care plans.

The registered provider understood the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and had systems in place to assess people’s capacity. Assistance had been given to people to help them orientate themselves to their own living space within the building. The health needs of people were promoted.

People were supported in a dignified and respectful manner. People remained independent, had their privacy promoted and had their personal accommodation respected by the staff team.

People’s confidential information was kept secure at all times.

Care plans were very person centred and people who used the service had been involved in their development. A robust complaints procedure for investigating concerns was in place. The registered provider facilitated access to activities for people if they wished to participate. Information was provided to people in accessible formats if required.

People who used the service considered the service to be well run and were complimentary of the registered manager’s approach. The registered provider had robust audits in place to measure the quality of the support provided.

The views of people and other stakeholders were gained in order to inform the quality assurance process. The registered provider always informed us of events within the service as required by law.