• Care Home
  • Care home

Rose Lodge & Holland House Care Home

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

35a Church Street, Market Deeping, Peterborough, Cambridgeshire, PE6 8AN (01778) 344454

Provided and run by:
Country Court Care Homes 2 Limited

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Rose Lodge and Holland House is a care home that supports adults of all ages, including those with living with dementia or physical disabilities. The service is registered to accommodate up to 47 people. At the time of our assessment there were 43 people living at the service.

We inspected this service due to the length of time since their last inspection.

The assessment took place between 29 October and 11 November 2025. We visited Rose Lodge and Holland House on 29 October 2025. This was a planned inspection, we looked at a selection of quality statements in all five key questions of safe, effective, caring, responsive and well led.

The service was consistently well run and delivered safe, caring and person‑centred support. Governance arrangements included regular audits with actions tracked through meetings and daily handovers, helping staff maintain consistent standards. Medicines were administered safely, with clear protocols and staff competency checks. Infection prevention was robust, supported by structured cleaning schedules, correct PPE use and visible hygiene practices. Staffing was stable and responsive to people’s needs.

People and their relatives reported prompt help and attentive support. Care planning reflected individual preferences and risks, including hydration, nutrition and mobility, and people were supported to pursue interests such as knitting, gardening, outings and worship. The registered manager was visible, approachable and worked alongside the team, acting on feedback to improve the service. Minor improvement opportunities were noted, such as enhancing dementia-friendly signage while respecting individual preferences. Overall, people experienced good outcomes, felt safe, and described staff as kind and respectful.

7 September 2017

During a routine inspection

We inspected the service on 7 September 2017. The visit was unannounced which meant that the registered manager and staff did not know we were coming.

Rose Lodge is a registered care service providing personal care and support for up to 33 older people. There were 33 people using the service when we visited and some were living with dementia.

There was a registered manager. It is a requirement that the service has a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Staff knew their responsibilities to help keep people safe from harm and abuse. The registered manager took action where an accident or incident occurred to try to prevent a reoccurrence. Risks to people’s health and well-being were assessed and monitored. Staff had guidance on how to help people to remain safe including in the event of an emergency. The provider had safely recruited a suitable number of staff to provide care and support to people.

People received their medicines when they required them by staff who had received training and guidance to administer them safely. The registered manager planned to remind staff to remain with people until they were sure people had taken their medicines as this had not always occurred.

People received care from staff members with the necessary knowledge and skills. Staff received on-going support and they knew their responsibilities. They received training in areas such as the safe handling of medicines and assisting people to move from one position to another.

People were asked for their consent before care was undertaken. People were supported in line with the Mental Capacity Act 2005. People’s mental capacity had been assessed where required and any decision made in a person’s best interest involved important people in their life. The provider had made applications to the appropriate body where they had sought to deprive some people using the service of their liberties to make sure this was safe. Staff understood the requirements under the Act.

People were satisfied with the variety of food and drink available to them. The provider was making changes to the serving of people’s food based on the feedback they had received. Staff knew people’s dietary requirements and where there were concerns about a person’s eating and drinking, specialist advice was sought.

People were supported to maintain their health and close observation occurred where this was required. People had access to healthcare professionals such as to a doctor and optician.

People’s privacy and dignity was protected and staff offered their support in caring and compassionate ways. People’s friends and family could visit without undue restriction.

People’s life history and things that mattered to them were known by staff. Their independence was maintained for as long as possible by staff who offered encouragement.

People received care based on things that mattered to them. This was because people or their relatives contributed to the planning and review of their care. Staff had the guidance they needed to meet people’s preferences and care requirements.

People and their loved ones spoke highly of the activities available at Rose Lodge. The activities available were based on people’s interests and things that mattered to them.

People and their visitors knew how to make a complaint. The registered manager took action to make improvements where this was required following a complaint being made.

The service was well-led and it had an open approach to sharing information with other agencies. There were opportunities for staff, people and their families to offer suggestions for how the service could improve. The provider and registered manager listened and took action based on the feedback received.

The registered manager was aware of their responsibilities. The provider and registered manager carried out quality checks of the service to make sure that it was of a high standard.