• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Lauriem Complete Care Limited - Deal

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

32 Albert Road, Deal, Kent, CT14 9FE (01304) 361222

Provided and run by:
Lauriem Complete Care Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed - see old profile

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Our current view of the service

Good

Updated 13 August 2026

About the service
Lauriem Complete Care Limited – Deal is a domiciliary care agency providing personal care and support to people living in their own homes.

Who the service is for
Lauriem Complete Care Limited – Deal support older adults, people living with dementia, people with physical disabilities and people living with sensory impairments.
At the time of the assessment, the service was supporting 48 people with the regulated activity of personal care.

Key findings

We carried out this assessment between 18 August to 26 August 2026. We visited the office on 18 August 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

The service had systems in place to safeguard people from abuse and avoidable harm. Staff understood their safeguarding responsibilities and records demonstrated incidents, safeguarding concerns and medication errors were investigated, reviewed and used as opportunities for learning and improvement. Care plans and risk assessments generally reflected people's individual needs and provided guidance for staff on how to manage risks associated with mobility, skin integrity, medicines, epilepsy, continence, nutrition and deteriorating health conditions.

People received support from staff who had completed mandatory and role-specific training. Training compliance was high and staff told us they felt supported by managers and office staff. Medicines were managed through care planning, audits, competency assessments and governance systems. Where medication errors had occurred, the provider had investigated these, identified learning and implemented actions to reduce the likelihood of recurrence.

Care plans were generally detailed and person-centred. Records reflected people's preferences, routines, communication needs and desired outcomes. Most care records reviewed promoted independence, choice and control and demonstrated a person-centred approach to risk management. Staff recognised changes in people's health and wellbeing and there was evidence of escalation to healthcare professionals when concerns were identified.

The service had systems in place to monitor quality and safety. Leaders used audits, performance monitoring, incident reviews, medication audits, safeguarding oversight and staff feedback to identify risks and drive improvement. Staff spoke positively about management support and leaders demonstrated an open and reflective approach when concerns were identified.

Whilst most records reviewed were personalised and detailed, we identified some minor inconsistencies in the quality and completion of documentation. Workforce pressures, continuity of carers and call timing reliability were recurring themes identified through the feedback, although leaders were aware of these challenges and had measures in place to monitor and respond to them. People did not describe any impact on their care and support as a result.
 

People's experience of the service

Updated 13 August 2026

People and relatives consistently told us they were happy with the care and support they received and described staff as kind, caring and compassionate. One person told us, "I do feel safe with all my carers", whilst another said, "I am so grateful having them, at no time has any of them made me feel unsafe ever." A relative told us, "I feel my wife is very safe with the carers."

People spoke positively about the relationships they had developed with staff. One person told us, "I look forward to them coming as they are the only people I see through the day," whilst another said staff would "comfort me, reassure me and really cheer me up before they leave." People consistently described staff as polite and supportive.

People told us staff respected their privacy and dignity. Comments included, "Very strong on this, always use towels to protect my dignity" and "Before they start my personal care they ensure my curtains are closed and protect my modesty." People also said they never felt rushed during visits and staff took time to ensure support was completed properly.

People and relatives gave examples of staff recognising when they were unwell and taking action. This included contacting GPs, requesting district nurse involvement and supporting people when their health needs changed. One person told us, "When my legs swelled up to twice their size the carer got in touch with my GP", whilst another explained their carer identified an infection and contacted healthcare professionals to ensure treatment was provided.

Where people had raised concerns, they told us managers listened and took action. Several people described previous concerns regarding individual carers which had been addressed to their satisfaction. One person said, "I complained and this was resolved to my satisfaction and I would not hesitate to complain again if it was necessary."

The most common concerns related to continuity of carers and call times. Some people told us they experienced late visits, particularly at weekends, and did not always know who would be attending. Despite this, people remained positive about the quality of care they received and recognised the pressures staff were working under. One person said, "The carers do their best under considerable pressure."

Overall, people and relatives were very positive about the care they received and consistently praised staff for their kindness, compassion and professionalism. Whilst some concerns were raised regarding continuity and visit times, people told us staff treated them with dignity, listened to them and responded appropriately when support was needed.