• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Clyde House

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

258 Sedlescombe Road North, St Leonards On Sea, East Sussex, TN37 7JL (01424) 751002

Provided and run by:
New Century Care (St. Leonards) Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed - see old profile

All Inspections

5 January 2017

During a routine inspection

We inspected Clyde House on the 5, 6 and 9 January 2017. This was an unannounced inspection.

Clyde House provides accommodation, personal and nursing care for up to 48 older people, some of whom have limited mobility, are physically very frail with health problems such as heart disease, diabetes and strokes. There were people at Clyde House also living with dementia and receiving end of life care. There were 24 people living at the home at the time of our inspection. Accommodation is arranged over two floors and each person had their own bedroom. Each floor has lift access, making all areas of the home accessible to people.

Clyde House is a large detached house in a residential area of St Leonards on Sea, close to public transport, local amenities and some shops. The service is owned by New Century Care (St. Leonards) Limited and is one of two homes in the South East.

At a comprehensive inspection in October 2015 the overall rating was Inadequate and the service was placed into special measures by the Care Quality Commission (CQC). Seven breaches of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) 2014 were identified. Following the inspection, we received an action plan which set out what actions were to be taken to achieve compliance. Due to concerns we received in February 2016 we undertook a focussed inspection to look at people’s safety. We found that that the concerns were substantiated and that people’s health and safety was not assured by the deployment and experience of staff. Continued breaches of Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) 2014 were found. At this time we took appropriate enforcement action. We undertook a full comprehensive inspection in May 2016 to see if improvements had been made. Whilst we could see that some action had been taken to improve people’s safety, the management of risk to individual people remained. Improvement was still needed to ensure people received support in a person centred way and were treated with dignity and respect. People were still not receiving support that was individualised to their needs. There were still concerns in respect of the quality assurance systems in place to drive improvement. This meant that there were continued breaches of Regulation of Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) 2014. Further appropriate enforcement action was taken. We received an action plan from the provider that told us that they were taking action to ensure the health and safety of people who lived at Clyde House.

This unannounced comprehensive inspection on the 5, 6 and 9 January 2017 found that whilst there were areas still to improve and embed in to everyday practice, there had been significant progress made and that they had now met the breaches of regulation.

A registered manager was in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Care plans reflected people’s assessed level of care needs and were based on people's preferences. Risk assessments included falls, skin damage, behaviours that distress, nutritional risks including swallowing problems and risk of choking and moving and handling. For example, cushions were in place for people who were susceptible to skin damage and pressure ulcers. The care plans also highlighted health risks such as diabetes and epilepsy. Visits from healthcare professionals were recorded in the care plans, with information about any changes and guidance for staff to ensure people's needs were met. There were systems in place for the management of medicines and people received their medicines in a safe way.

Registered nurses were involved in writing the care plans and all staff were expected to record the care and support provided and any changes in people's needs. The manager said care staff were being supported to do this and additional training was on-going. Food and fluid charts were completed and showed people were supported to have a varied and nutritious diet.

Staff had a good understanding of people's needs and treated them with respect and protected their dignity when supporting them. People we spoke with were complimentary about the caring nature of the staff. People told us care staff were kind and compassionate. Staff interactions demonstrated staff had built rapport with people and they responded to staff with smiles. People previously isolated in their room were seen in communal lounges for activities, meetings and meal times and were seen to enjoy the atmosphere and stimulation.

A range of activities were available for people to participate in if they wished and people enjoyed spending time with staff. Activities were provided throughout the whole day, five days a week and were in line with people's preferences and interests.

The provider had progressed quality assurance systems to review the support and care provided. A number of audits had been developed including those for accidents and incidents, care plans, medicines and health and safety. Maintenance records for equipment and the environment were up to date, such as fire safety equipment and hoists. Policies and procedures had been reviewed and updated and were available for staff to refer to as required. Staff said they were encouraged to suggest improvements to the service and relatives told us they could visit at any time and, they were always made to feel welcome and involved in the care provided.

Staff and relatives felt there were enough staff working in the home and relatives said staff were available to support people when they needed assistance. The provider was actively seeking new staff, nurses and care staff, to ensure there were a sufficient number with the right skills when people moved into the home. The provider had made training and updates mandatory for all staff, including safeguarding people, moving and handling, management of challenging behaviour, pressure area care, falls prevention and dementia care. Staff said the training was very good and helped them to understand people's needs.

All staff had attended safeguarding training. They demonstrated a clear understanding of abuse; they said they would talk to the management or external bodies immediately if they had any concerns, and they had a clear understanding of making referrals to the local authority and CQC. Pre-employment checks for staff were completed, which meant only suitable staff were working in the home. People said they felt comfortable and at ease with staff and relatives felt people were safe.

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) is required by law to monitor the operation of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) which applies to care homes. The provider, registered manager and staff had an understanding of their responsibilities and processes of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards.

Staff said the management was fair and approachable, care meetings were held every morning to discuss people's changing needs and how staff would meet these. Staff meetings were held monthly and staff were able to contribute to the meetings and make suggestions. Relatives said the management was very good; the registered manager was always available and, they would be happy to talk to them if they had any concerns.

3 May 2016

During a routine inspection

We inspected Clyde House on the 03, 04 and 06 May 2016. This was an unannounced inspection

Clyde House provides accommodation, personal and nursing care for up to 48 older people, some of whom have limited mobility, are physically very frail with health problems such as heart disease, diabetes and strokes. There were people at Clyde House also living with dementia and receiving end of life care. There were 28 people living at the home at the time of our inspection. Accommodation is arranged over three floors and each person had their own bedroom. Each floor has lift access, making all areas of the home accessible to people. The top floor known as Tay Wing provides care and support for up to 14 people who live with dementia and there were currently nine people on Tay Wing.

Clyde House is a large detached house in a residential area of St Leonards on Sea, close to public transport, local amenities and some shops. The service is owned by New Century Care (St. Leonards) Limited and is one of five homes in the South East.

Clyde House does not have a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. An area manager and project manager were covering the management role and were present during the inspection.

At a comprehensive inspection in October 2015 the overall rating was Inadequate and the service was placed into special measures by the Care Quality Commission (CQC). Seven breaches of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) 2014 were identified. We found significant risks to people due to the management of nutrition. Staff did not have relevant risk assessments in place to ensure their safety. People in the service did not receive care and support that was individualised to their needs and people were not always treated with dignity and respect. People had not been protected against unsafe treatment by the quality assurance systems in place. There were also concerns relating to the management and leadership of the practice, specifically in the well led domain. Following the inspection, we received an action plan which set out what actions were to be taken to achieve compliance. Due to concerns we received in February 2016 we undertook a focussed inspection to look at peoples’ safety. We found that that the concerns were substantiated and that people’s health and safety was not assured by the deployment and experience of staff. Continued breaches of Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) 2014 were found.

During our inspection on 03, 04 and 06 May 2016, we looked to see if improvements had been made. We could see that some action had been taken to improve people’s safety, but the management of risk to individual people remained. Improvement was still needed to ensure people received support in a person centred way and were treated with dignity and respect. People were still not receiving support that was individualised to their needs. There were still concerns in respect of the quality assurance systems in place to drive improvement.

Accidents and incident reporting had taken place and recorded but lacked documented investigation and measures to ensure learning and preventative measures. Staff had training on keeping people safe and understood the process of reporting concerns. Staff had been checked to ensure they were suitable before starting work in the service.

Whilst occupancy has reduced in the home the provider has maintained the same staffing levels and reviewed dependency needs on a monthly basis. Permanent staff have been secured and started at the service which has reduced the reliance on agency staff usage. We were concerned that there was variable leadership and delivery of care on the two inspection days. On one day there was no clear deployment of staff and no clear leadership. Training had been booked to discuss person centred care. Staff said they felt supported and all staff were now having supervision.

Staff had an understanding of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and had received refresher training. However, there were still some issues around consent and ensuring that people were offered choice whilst adhering to the risk strategies put in place by health professionals.

The meal delivery was seen to have improved on day one of the inspection process but day two was very different both in delivery and in quality.

People were supported to access health professionals or appointments. The home manager has identified that some services with other visiting healthcare professionals are not always supporting timely support and care and is working with the agencies to improve provision and input.

Training had been booked to discuss person centred care. Staff said they felt supported and all staff were now having supervision.

Staff had training on keeping people safe and understood the process of reporting concerns. Staff had been checked to ensure they were suitable before starting work in the service.

Staff had attended meetings to enable them to raise concerns and discuss issues collectively.

The service had systems and processes to assess and monitor that the service was of a good quality. However, we found these had not identified issues around person centred support. The service was working with Commissioners to ensure that clear outcomes for individuals in the service were identified and worked towards.

The overall rating for this provider is ‘Inadequate’. This means that it remains in ‘Special measures’ by CQC. The purpose of special measures is to:

• Ensure that providers found to be providing inadequate care significantly improve.

• Provide a framework within which we use our enforcement powers in response to inadequate care and work with, or signpost to, other organisations in the system to ensure improvements are made.

Services placed in special measures will be inspected again within six months. The service will be kept under review and if needed could be escalated to urgent enforcement action.

We found a number of breaches of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of this report.

25 February 2016

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Clyde House provides accommodation, personal and nursing care for up to 48 older people, some of whom have limited mobility, are physically very frail with health problems such as heart disease, diabetes and strokes. There were people at Clyde House also living with dementia and receiving end of life care. There were 35 people living at the home at the time of our inspection. Accommodation is arranged over three floors and each person had their own bedroom. Each floor has lift access, making all areas of the home accessible to people. The top floor known as Tay Wing provides care and support for up to 14 people who live with dementia and there were currently 11 people on Tay Wing.

Clyde House is a large detached house in a residential area of St Leonards on Sea, close to public transport, local amenities and some shops. The service is owned by New Century Care (St. Leonards) Limited and is one of six homes in the South East.

We carried out an unannounced comprehensive inspection of this service on 7 and 9 October 2015. After that inspection we received new information of concerns in relation to people’s safety and insufficient experienced staff. As a result we undertook a focused inspection 25 February 2016 to look into those concerns. This report only covers our findings in relation to this topic. You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the 'all reports' link for Clyde House Home on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

Whilst there is a manager recorded as registered, we were informed that that the manager has now left the service. An interim manager has been in post since December 2015. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated regulations about how the service is run.

Risks to people’s safety and welfare had not always been appropriately addressed. People were placed at risk of falls and injuries due to poor positioning in chairs and lack of appropriate risk assessments. People were also placed at risk of choking whilst they were assisted with meals as their meals were not of correct consistency and they were not placed in an upright position. .

Care plans did not all reflect people’s assessed level of care needs and care delivery was not person specific or holistic. We found that people with specific health problems such as wound care did not have sufficient guidance in place for staff to deliver safe care. This had resulted in potential risks to their safety and well-being. Injuries to people had not been recorded and there were no care plans or risk assessments in place to prevent a re-occurrence of injury or to ensure peoples safety.

There were insufficient numbers of suitably skilled and experienced staff deployed in the service to meet people’s needs. This meant that people waited unreasonable lengths of time for care and for assistance with their meals. Staffing deployment had impacted on people receiving the support required to ensure their safety, health and nutritional needs were met.

We found breaches of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of this report.

7 and 9 October 2015

During a routine inspection

We inspected Clyde House on the 7 and 9 October 2015.

Clyde House provides accommodation, personal and nursing care for up to 48 older people, some of whom have limited mobility, are physically very frail with health problems such as heart disease, diabetes and strokes. There were people at Clyde House also living with dementia and receiving end of life care. There were 34 people living at the home at the time of our inspection. Accommodation is arranged over three floors and each person had their own bedroom. Each floor has lift access, making all areas of the home accessible to people. The top floor known as Tay Wing provides care and support for up to 14 people who live with dementia and there were currently 11 people on Tay Wing.

Clyde House is a large detached house in a residential area of St Leonards on Sea, close to public transport, local amenities and some shops. The service is owned by New Century Care (St. Leonards) Limited and is one of six homes in the South East.

People commented positively about the care and support received and their experience at Clyde House. However, the inspection highlighted significant shortfalls that had the potential to compromise the safety of people in the service.

A manager has been recruited following the resignation of the registered manager in July 2015. The manager had submitted an application to the CQC to be registered. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated regulations about how the service is run.

Care plans did not all reflect people’s assessed level of care needs and care delivery was not person specific or holistic. We found that people with specific health problems such as wound care did not have sufficient guidance in place for staff to deliver safe care. Not everyone had risk assessments that guided staff to promote people’s comfort, nutrition, skin integrity and the prevention of pressure damage. This had resulted in potential risks to their safety and well-being. Staffing deployment had impacted on people receiving the support required to ensure their nutritional needs were met.

The delivery of care suited staff routine rather than individual choice. Care plans lacked sufficient information on people’s likes, dislikes, what time they wanted to get up in the morning or go to bed. Where people’s health needs had changed, such as not eating and drinking, care plans did not reflect the changes and therefore staff were uninformed of important changes to care delivery.

Information was not always readily available on people’s life history and there was no evidence that people were involved in their care plan. The lack of meaningful activities for people, specifically those who remained on bed rest or lived with dementia, at this time impacted negatively on people’s well-being.

Whilst people were complimentary about the food at Clyde House, the dining experience was not a social and enjoyable experience for people. People were not always supported to eat and drink in a dignified manner.

Quality assurance systems were in place, however there were areas that had lapsed and had not identified some of the shortfalls found at this inspection.

Arrangements for the supervision and appraisal of staff were now in place. It was acknowledged there were gaps in supervision for staff due to the changeover of managers. Staff told us that meetings now took place and they felt supported by the organisation.

People we spoke with were complimentary about the caring nature of some of the staff. People told us care staff were kind and compassionate. However we also saw examples where staff were not treating people with respect when delivering care. We also saw that some people were supported with little verbal interaction and some people spent time isolated in their room.

People had access to appropriate healthcare professionals. Staff told us how they would contact the GP if they had concerns about people’s health.

People were protected, as far as possible, by a safe recruitment system. Each personnel file had a completed application form listing their work history as wells as their skills and qualifications. Nurses employed by Clyde House all had registration with the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) which was up to date.

The overall rating for this provider is ‘Inadequate’. This means that it has been placed into ‘Special measures’ by CQC. The purpose of special measures is to:

• Ensure that providers found to be providing inadequate care significantly improve.

• Provide a framework within which we use our enforcement powers in response to inadequate care and work with, or signpost to, other organisations in the system to ensure improvements are made.

Services placed in special measures will be inspected again within six months. The service will be kept under review and if needed could be escalated to urgent enforcement action.

We found a number of breaches of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of this report.