• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Optima Homecare Group Limited

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Omega House, Suite 15, 6 Buckingham Place, Bellfield Road, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, HP13 5HW (01494) 435319

Provided and run by:
Optima Homecare Group Limited

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date Assessment Commenced: 13 August 2025 and ended on 28 August 2025. This inspection was completed remotely. There was a registered manager in post at the time of inspection. The service is a care at home service providing support to older people, some of whom live with dementia, or have physical disabilities. This assessment has been undertaken of a specialist service that is registered for use by autistic people or people with a learning disability. At the time of the assessment, the service was not used by anyone with a learning disability or an autistic person. However, we assessed the care provision under Right Support, Right Care, Right Culture, as it is registered as a specialist service for this population group.

People were protected from avoidable harm and abuse. Staff understood their safeguarding responsibilities and followed procedures aligned with national guidance. People told us they felt safe.  Risks were assessed and managed in partnership with people and their families, and care plans reflected individual needs and preferences. The provider maintained safe environments and ensured equipment was regularly serviced and used appropriately. Medicines were managed safely, and infection prevention and control measures were in place.

Care and support were effective and based on best available evidence. People’s needs were assessed thoroughly, and care plans were person-centred. Staff worked well with families and professionals to deliver consistent care. People were supported to live healthier lives, and outcomes were monitored and improved over time. Consent was sought and respected.

Staff treated people with kindness, compassion and dignity. Care was tailored to individual needs, and people were supported to maintain independence and control over their care. Staff responded promptly to people’s needs and were supported to deliver person-centred care.

The service was responsive to people’s needs. Care was well-organised and delivered by consistent staff who knew people well. People were involved in decisions about their care, and feedback was used to improve services. Information was accessible, and staff used communication tools to support people with sensory or cognitive needs. People had access to healthcare professionals when needed, and care planning included future needs and preferences.

Leadership promoted a positive culture of person-centred care. Staff felt supported and valued, and leaders were described as approachable and responsive. Governance systems were in place, although limited due to the small size of the provider. The provider acknowledged the need to strengthen governance as the service grows. Staff were encouraged to speak up, and diversity and inclusion were promoted across the workforce. The provider worked in partnership with families and professionals to improve outcomes and shared learning across the service.

 

24 July 2017

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 24 and 27 July 2017. It was an announced visit to the service.

This was the service’s first inspection since registration.

Malkuwth Home Care Limited provides care to people in their own homes. Six people were receiving care at the time of our inspection, in the High Wycombe area.

The service had a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the service is run.

We received positive feedback about the service. Comments from people included “I can’t fault them,” “You can sit back and relax” and “Continuity of care has been incredibly reassuring.” A relative told us “Carers do an incredible job. Without them (family member) would have gone into care.” Another relative said “It’s more of a devotion than it is a job, that’s the kind of people they are.”

People were protected from the risk of abuse. There were safeguarding procedures and training on abuse to provide staff with the skills and knowledge to recognise and respond to safeguarding concerns. Written risk assessments had been prepared to reduce the likelihood of injury or harm to people during the provision of their care. People’s medicines were handled safely and given to them in accordance with their prescriptions.

There were sufficient staff to meet people’s needs. The service used thorough recruitment processes to select staff, to make sure people were supported by staff with the right skills and attributes. Staff received appropriate support through a structured induction and regular supervision. They kept their training updated to make sure they supported people safely.

Care plans had been written for each person to record the support they required. These had been kept up to date to reflect changes in people’s needs.

There had not been any complaints about the service. People knew how to raise any concerns if they needed to.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

The service was managed well. The provider regularly checked the quality of care at the service through home visits to people, spot checks and audits. Records were maintained to a good standard and staff had access to policies and procedures to guide their practice.