• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Angels Care At Home Ltd

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

Bowman House, Room 36, Whitehill Industrial Estate, Bowman Court, Whitehill Lane, Royal Wootton Bassett, Swindon, SN4 7DB 07561 429451

Provided and run by:
Angels Care at Home Limited

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Our current view of the service

Requires improvement

Updated 24 March 2026

Date of assessment 15 April to 13 May 2026.

Angels Care at Home Ltd is a domiciliary care agency registered to provide personal care to people living in their own homes in Swindon and Hertfordshire. At the time of this inspection, 10 people were receiving a regulated activity.

This assessment was carried out to follow up on the previous rating of requires improvementand to review breaches of regulation identified at the last inspection.

At the time of the inspection the provider was supporting 2 people with a learning disability and autistic people. We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. We asked the service to apply for the additional service user bands of learning disabilities and autistic people as a requirement of their registration with Care Quality Commission (CQC).

The provider had not yet fully implemented effective governance systems, and we continued to identify some shortfalls. For example, some care plans and risk assessments contained incomplete, inconsistent, or missing information. This meant staff did not always have clear and accurate guidance to support the delivery of safe and consistent care.

Mental Capacity Assessments (MCAs), required under the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005, were not consistently completed for people who may lack capacity. This meant the provider could not demonstrate decisions about people’s care were always made lawfully or in their best interests.

Incidents were not always fully documented or investigated to establish causes and support learning and improvement. People also continued to experience visits outside of scheduled times, in some cases up to an hour early or late. This meant people did not always receive care at the times they expected or required.

Although these concerns were identified, there was no evidence to indicate that people had come to any harm.

However, improvements had been made since the last assessment. A new registered manager was in post and had begun to drive positive changes in the service. Staff told us they felt supported, were able to contact leaders when needed, and received timely responses. Policies previously identified as incomplete had been reviewed and updated. Partners now provided positive feedback about the improvement in communication with the service.

The service had made some improvements and were no longer in breach of safe care and treatment, fit and proper persons employed and staffing.

We identified two breaches of the legal requirement in relation to need for consent and governance.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

People's experience of the service

Updated 24 March 2026

Feedback was gathered from people and their relatives off-site, and responses about the service were mixed. People told us that communication had improved since the previous assessment, particularly following the appointment of the new registered manager. A comment included, “It was hard to contact the office previously, very sporadic if it was answered. It has been consistent lately; someone has always answered.” However, some people reported ongoing minor miscommunication between leaders, mainly in relation to scheduled visit times.

People said there had been no missed visits since the last assessment, but some noted that visit did not always take place at the agreed times. Most people told us staff were generally well trained, although additional training was required for some staff on how to work with people with a learning disability and autistic people. Where concerns had been raised more recently, people and their relatives felt these had been listened to and responded to. Overall, people told us they felt safe when being supported by staff. Comments included, “I’m very pleased with them. The carers are very good,” and “[Staff name] is worth their weight in gold, there is a good rapport with them.”