• Dentist
  • Dentist

H W Preiskel

25 Upper Wimpole Street, London, W1G 6NF (020) 7935 4525

Provided and run by:
H.W. Preiskel

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

We carried out this announced on-site inspection on 10 April 2026.

We found the practice had met regulations.

The practice had effective systems to identify and manage risks, including infection prevention and control.

Staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to carry out their roles.

Recruitment procedures reflected current legislation and there was effective leadership and a culture of continuous improvement.

Staff provided care and treatment in line with current guidance. They treated patients with dignity and respect and ensured access to care, support, and treatment when required.

The practice is in the London Borough of Westminster and provides private dental care and treatment for adults.

Step-free access to the practice was enabled with a portable ramp and car parking spaces available, including dedicated parking for disabled people, near the practice.

The practice had 3 treatment rooms. At the time of our inspection, there was a total of 6 staff, of which there were 2 specialist prosthodontists (1 of whom worked in a non-clinical capacity), 1 dental nurse, 1 dental hygienist, and 2 practice managers who were also qualified dental nurses. We gathered feedback from staff and spoke to a range of staff during our inspection, including the specialist prosthodontists, the dental nurse and the practice managers.

1 July 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with two people who had used the practice for some years and who were very positive about their experiences. They said the practice was clean. One said the practice was 'the best in London' because the staff were excellent at both technical and personal care. There were systems for seeking people's feedback about the service and we saw this was positive.

There were suitable processes for staff training and professional development. Staff were supported by the practice's systems and policies. Each person was assessed for their suitability prior to any treatment; they were involved in planning their treatment and could ask as many questions as they wished. There were effective systems in place to reduce the risk and spread of infection. Staff had been trained in infection control and for emergency situations.

The practice had systems to review and monitor the quality and safety of the service provided. These included risk assessments and audits.