• Dentist
  • Dentist

Loughton Dental Spa

1st Floor, 138 Church Hill, Loughton, Essex, IG10 1LJ (020) 8508 4205

Provided and run by:
Dr Ritu Dhariwal

All Inspections

9 August 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a follow up desk-based review of Loughton Dental Spa on 9 August 2022. This review was carried out to review in detail the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements.

The review was undertaken by a CQC inspector who had access to a specialist dental adviser.

We undertook a comprehensive inspection of Loughton Dental Spa on 8 October 2021 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found the registered provider was not providing well led care and was in breach of regulation 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for Loughton Dental Spa dental practice on our website www.cqc.org.uk.

When one or more of the five questions are not met we require the service to make improvements and send us an action plan. We then inspect again after a reasonable interval, focusing on the area where improvement was required.

As part of this review we asked:

• Is it well-led?

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 8 October 2021.

Background

Loughton Dental Spa is in Essex and provides NHS and private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

The dental team includes a principal dentist, one dental nurse and a receptionist. The practice has two treatment rooms.

During the review we spoke remotely with the principal dentist and the dental nurse. We looked at practice policies and procedures and reviewed records the practice had sent to us about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Monday to Fridays 9am to 5pm (they close for lunch during 1am to 2pm)

8 October 2021

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out this announced inspection on 8 October 2021 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to follow up on information of concern we received and to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspector who was supported by a CQC specialist dental advisor.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we usually ask five key questions, however due to the ongoing pandemic and to reduce time spent on site, only the following three questions were asked:

Is it safe?

Is it effective

Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Loughton Dental Spa is in Essex and provides NHS and private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

The practice consists of the principal dentist and two dental nurses who work on a part time basis. The clinical team are supported by a receptionist. The practice has two treatment rooms.

During the inspection we spoke with the principal dentist, two dental nurses, and the receptionist.

The practice is open between 9am to 1 pm and 2pm to 5pm Mondays to Fridays.

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared to be visibly clean and well-maintained.
  • The provider had safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • There were arrangements to manage risks of COVID-19 virus in accordance with current guidelines.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available, and staff undertook training in basic life support.
  • The provider had information governance arrangements.
  • The provider had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance. Improvements were needed to ensure these procedures were followed and monitored appropriately.
  • Improvements were needed to the systems to manage risk to patients and staff.
  • There was a lack of effective leadership to support a culture of continuous improvement.

We identified regulations the provider was not complying with. They must:

  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Review the security of NHS prescription pads in the practice and ensure there are systems in place to track and monitor their use.
  • Review the practice's system for identifying, disposing and replenishing of out-of-date stock.

Full details of the regulation the provider was not meeting are at the end of this report.

10 May 2017

During a routine inspection

We carried out this announced inspection on 10 May 2017 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

21 May 2013

During a routine inspection

People's needs were assessed and care and treatment was planned and delivered in line with their individual care plans.

A person who used the service told us, “I have been very happy with the service I get here. No-one likes coming to the dentist but they make it as painless as possible.”

During our inspection we saw that the reception area, treatment rooms and the decontamination room were clean and well maintained. Work surfaces and equipment were in good condition and easy to keep clean.

Staff told us about the process for annual appraisal. We were told staff had the opportunity to meet with the provider to specifically discuss areas of performance and development plans for the forthcoming year. Staff told us that they felt supported in their professional role.

There was an effective complaints process in place. People told us they had not had any reason to complain however, they said they felt confident to approach any member of staff if they had any concerns.