• Dentist
  • Dentist

Archived: Romney Place Dental Practice

4 Romney Place, Maidstone, Kent, ME15 6LE (01622) 754833

Provided and run by:
Dr. Martin Sagar

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

26 February 2020

During a routine inspection

We carried out this announced inspection on 26 February 2020 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission, (CQC), inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Romney Place Dental Practice is in Maidstone and provides private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There is level access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces, including dedicated parking for disabled people, are available opposite the practice.

The dental team includes two dentists, three dental nurses and three receptionists. The practice has one treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

On the day of inspection, we collected 26 CQC comment cards filled in by patients and spoke with four other patients.

During the inspection we spoke with a dentist, a dental nurse and two receptionists. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

  • Monday and Thursday 9am to 5.45pm
  • Tuesday and Wednesday 7.45am to 6pm
  • Friday 8.15am to 2pm
  • Weekends closed

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared to be visibly clean. The practice was well-maintained, although this required improvement.
  • The provider had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available, although this required some improvements.
  • The provider had systems to help them manage risk to patients and staff.
  • The provider had safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.
  • The provider had staff recruitment procedures which reflected current legislation.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The appointment system took account of patients’ needs.
  • The provider had effective leadership and a culture of continuous improvement.
  • Staff felt involved and supported and worked as a team.
  • The provider asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The provider dealt with complaints positively and efficiently.
  • The provider had information governance arrangements.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Take action to ensure the availability of equipment in the practice to manage medical emergencies taking into account the guidelines issued by the Resuscitation Council (UK) and the General Dental Council.
  • Improve the practice's systems for checking and monitoring equipment taking into account relevant guidance and ensure that all equipment is well maintained. Ensure that a 5-year electrical wiring safety check is conducted.
  • Implement audits for prescribing of antibiotic medicines taking into account the guidance provided by the Faculty of General Dental Practice.
  • Implement an effective system for receiving and responding to patient safety alerts, recalls and rapid response reports issued by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, the Central Alerting System and other relevant bodies, such as Public Health England.

28 March 2012

During a routine inspection

People told us that they were given information and were involved in making decisions about their treatment. They told us that the dentist explained everything in detail to them.

One person told us 'I have been coming here for 40 years this is a very good practice'. Other comments received were 'I have been coming here for 21 years, everything here is excellent', and 'I recently broke a tooth they were excellent. They are good in giving you an emergency appointment and I was able to see the dentist the next day. I have very sensitive teeth and he always does something with a spray that helps'.