• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Caring For You Home Services Ltd

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Unit 2, Woodview, Bull Lane, Acton, Sudbury, Suffolk, CO10 0FD (01787) 372131

Provided and run by:
Caring For You Home Services Ltd

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

All Inspections

3 June 2016

During a routine inspection

The inspection took place on 03 June 2016 and was announced. We gave the provider 48 hours’ notice of the inspection in order to ensure people we needed to speak with were available. The service provides personal support to people by arrangement in their home in the local area.

The service has a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People were protected from the risk of abuse as staff had attended training to ensure they had a good understanding of their roles and responsibilities. Staff knew how to report matters to the appropriate authorities if they suspected abuse was happening. The manager knew how to share information with the local authority when needed.

People were supported by a sufficient number of suitably qualified staff. The manager had ensured appropriate recruitment checks were carried out on staff before they started work. Staff had been recruited safely and had the skills and knowledge to provide care and support in ways that people preferred.

The provider had systems in place so that staff were trained to administer medicines and people were supported to take their prescribed medicines safely.

The service was meeting the requirements of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). Staff had received training in mental capacity assessments, best interest and were competent to work with relevant professionals. This ensured that decisions were taken in accordance with the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005, DoLS and associated Codes of Practice. The Act, Safeguards and Codes of Practice are in place to protect the rights of adults by ensuring that if there is a need for restrictions on their freedom and liberty these are assessed and decided by appropriately trained professionals.

The staff responded to people’s needs in a compassionate and caring manner. Positive and supportive relationships had been built up between the staff, people using the service and relatives. People were supported to make day to day decisions and were treated with dignity and respect at all times. People were given choices in their daily routines and their privacy and dignity was respected. People were supported and enabled to be as independent as possible in all aspects of their lives.

Staff knew people well and were trained, skilled and competent in meeting people’s needs. Staff were supported and supervised in their roles. People and family members were involved in the planning and reviewing of their care and support.

People’s health needs were managed appropriately with input from relevant health care professionals. The service had worked with GP’s and Occupational Therapist to arrange appointments with these professionals and carry out support as instructed. People were supported to maintain a nutritionally balanced diet and sufficient fluid intake to maintain good health. Staff ensured that people’s health needs were effectively monitored.

The management was of a supportive culture and staff were supported to provide care that was centred on the individual. The manager and senior staff were approachable to people using the service and staff and enabled people who used the service to express their views.

People were supported to report any concerns or complaints and they felt they would be taken seriously. People who used the service or their representatives, were encouraged to be involved in decisions about the service. The provider had systems in place to check the quality of the service and take the views and concerns of people and their relatives into account to make improvements to the service.