• Dentist
  • Dentist

Green Lane Dental Practice

46 Green Lane, Ashton-on-Mersey, Sale, Cheshire, M33 5PP (0161) 973 3802

Provided and run by:
Mr. Ian Hutchinson

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

We undertook a follow-up on-site inspection on 4 June 2025. This was carried out to review the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to assess whether the practice was meeting legal requirements.

We had previously undertaken an announced on-site inspection of Green Lane Dental Practice on 1 March 2023. We had found the registered provider was not providing well-led care and was in breach of regulation 17, Good governance of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.

During our follow-up inspection, we found the practice had met regulations.

The practice had systems to manage risks. Recruitment procedures reflected current legislation.

Infection control procedures followed published guidance. Patients’ care and treatment was provided in line with current guidance. Patients were treated with dignity and respect.

At the time of our inspection, we found that patients could access care, support and treatment when required.

There was effective leadership and a culture of continuous improvement.

The practice is in Sale, Greater Manchester and provides private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There was step-free access to the practice and car parking spaces, including dedicated parking for disabled people, were available near the practice.

The practice had 2 treatment rooms.During the inspection we spoke with the dentist and the receptionist.

01 March 2023

During a routine inspection

We carried out this announced comprehensive inspection on 1 March 2023 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions.

We planned the inspection to check whether the registered practice was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations.

The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspector who was supported by a specialist dental advisor.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following 5 questions:

  • Is it safe?
  • Is it effective?
  • Is it caring?
  • Is it responsive to people’s needs?
  • Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

  • The dental clinic appeared clean and tidy.
  • The practice had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • Staff knew how to deal with medical emergencies. Improvements are required to ensure medical emergency medicines and equipment and within their expiry date and reflect national guidance.
  • Improvements are required to the systems to manage risks for patients, staff, equipment and the premises. In particular the risks associated with fire and for ensuring facilities are maintained in line with regulations.
  • Safeguarding processes were in place for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children. Staff had not completed the required level of safeguarding training.
  • The practice had staff recruitment procedures which reflected current legislation. Improvements could be made to the process for ensuring all staff have appropriate immunity to Hepatitis B.
  • Clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Patients were treated with dignity and respect. Staff took care to protect patients’ privacy and personal information.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The appointment system worked efficiently to respond to patients’ needs.
  • The frequency of appointments was agreed between the dentist and the patient, giving due regard to National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines.
  • Staff felt involved, supported and worked as a team.
  • Staff and patients were asked for feedback about the services provided.
  • Complaints were dealt with positively and efficiently.
  • The practice had information governance arrangements.
  • Improvements are required to ensure the oversight of the risks associated with the carrying out of the regulated activities are appropriately managed.

Background

Green Lane Dental Practice is in Sale and provides private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There is step free access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces are available near the practice. The practice has made reasonable adjustments to support patients with access requirements.

The dental team includes 1 dentist, 2 dental nurses and 1 dental hygienist. The practice has 2 treatment rooms.

During the inspection we spoke with the dentist, both dental nurses and the dental hygienist. We looked at practice policies, procedures and other records to assess how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Monday to Friday from 9am to 5pm

We identified regulations the provider was not complying with. They must:

  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

Full details of the regulations the provider was not meeting are at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Take action to ensure dispensed antibiotics are labelled correctly giving due regard to the Human Medicines Regulations 2012.

26 October 2012

During a routine inspection

Five patients told us that they were always asked to give signed consent before receiving treatment. They told us that they were given sufficient information to make informed choices about their treatment. The five patients spoke positively about the service they received. They said, 'Staff listen to me and they afford me respect" and "There is nothing they could do better. I am completely satisfied with the service I receive here."

Patients' records were held securely and had been kept up to date. The electronic record system included a tracking process to ensure that patients were contacted when they were due for check ups and ongoing treatment.

A patient told us that the practice was good at slotting people in for emergency appointments. Another person said, "I am here for a check up today. About three months ago I needed an extraction. The dentist told me what my treatment options were and the costs before I was asked to sign the consent form. I am very happy with the way things are done here."

All staff working for the practice had been trained to recognise the signs and symptoms of abuse. Two of the staff confidently described the action they would take if they suspected a patient might be at risk of abuse. Staff had received training that was appropriate to their roles and qualified staff had undertaken training to meet their ongoing professional development and maintain their registration with the General Dental Council.