• Dentist
  • Dentist

Archived: Dr Richard Kahan - Harley Street

99 Harley Street, London, W1G 6AQ (020) 7224 1999

Provided and run by:
Dr. Richard Kahan

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

15 August 2018

During a routine inspection

We carried out this announced inspection on 15 August 2018 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Dr Richard Kahan - Harley Street is in the London Borough of Westminster and provides private treatment to adults and children.

The practice is located in the basement of a building with three floors. There is access for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs via portable ramps. There is also a lift providing level access to treatment rooms. Car parking spaces (pay and display) are available near the practice.

The dental team includes the principal dentist, two associate dentists, two dental nurses, a receptionist and a practice manager. The practice has two treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

On the day of inspection, we collected four CQC comment cards filled in by patients and spoke with one other patients.

During the inspection we spoke with the principal dentist, a dental nurse and the practice manager. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open: Monday -Friday 8.00am – 5.30pm

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared clean and well maintained.
  • The provider had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available.
  • The practice had systems to help them manage risk to patients and staff.
  • The practice staff had suitable safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding adults at risk and children.
  • The provider had thorough staff recruitment procedures.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • The provider was providing preventive care and supporting patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The appointment system met patients’ needs.
  • The practice had effective leadership and culture of continuous improvement.
  • Staff felt involved and supported and worked well as a team.
  • The practice asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The provider dealt with complaints positively and efficiently.
  • The provider had suitable information governance arrangements.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Review staff training to ensure that all the staff have received training, to an appropriate level, in the safeguarding of children and vulnerable adults.
  • Review arrangements in place for carrying out sharps risk assessments.

9 January 2013

During a routine inspection

People told us that the practice provided them with sufficient information about treatment, outcomes and costs.

We found that the practice was clean and operated good decontamination procedures in line with government guidance. People said they were reassured by the level of cleanliness in the practice.

People said they were treated with respect by staff that were 'extremely professional and efficient'.

There was an effective quality monitoring process in place so that the provider could identify areas for improvement and act on them.