• Dentist
  • Dentist

Mr Mark Atkinson - Harley Street

104 Harley Street, Westminster, London, W1G 7JD (020) 7935 8687

Provided and run by:
Mr. Mark Atkinson

All Inspections

6 June 2023

During a routine inspection

We carried out this announced comprehensive inspection on 6 June 2023 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions.

We planned the inspection to check whether the registered practice was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations.

The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspector who was supported by a specialist dental advisor.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following 5 questions:

  • Is it safe?
  • Is it effective?
  • Is it caring?
  • Is it responsive to people’s needs?
  • Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

  • The dental clinic appeared clean and well-maintained.
  • The practice had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • Staff knew how to deal with medical emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available.
  • The practice had systems to manage risks for patients, staff, equipment, and the premises.
  • Safeguarding processes were in place and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.
  • The practice had staff recruitment procedures which reflected current legislation.
  • Clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Patients were treated with dignity and respect. Staff took care to protect patients’ privacy and personal information.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The appointment system worked efficiently to respond to patients’ needs.
  • The frequency of appointments was agreed between the dentist and the patient, giving due regard to National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines.
  • There was effective leadership and a culture of continuous improvement.
  • Staff felt involved, supported, and worked as a team.
  • Staff and patients were asked for feedback about the services provided.
  • Complaints were dealt with positively and efficiently.
  • The practice had information governance arrangements.

Background

Mr Mark Atkinson – Harley Street is in Westminster and provides private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There were steps at the entrance of the building. The practice used a portable ramp for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces, including dedicated parking for disabled people, are available near the practice.

The dental team included a principal dentist, a dental nurse, a dental hygienist, and a receptionist (who was also a qualified nurse and provided nursing cover). The practice has 2 treatment rooms.

During the inspection we spoke with the whole team. We looked at practice policies, procedures, and other records to assess how the service is managed.

The practice is open: 9am to 5.30pm Monday to Friday.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Implement an effective system for recording, investigating and reviewing incidents or significant events.
  • Improve the practice's protocols and procedures for the use of X-ray equipment in compliance with The Ionising Radiations Regulations 2017 and Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2017, taking into account the guidance for Dental Practitioners on the Safe Use of X-ray Equipment. In particular, ensuring that the radiation protection file is maintained in accordance with guidance.

22 May 2013

During a routine inspection

Patients we spoke with told us they were satisfied with the care and treatment they had received from the practice. One patient we spoke with had been using the practice for many years. They told us they had received sufficient information regarding their treatment in the past. Another patient told us that the practice was running a 'sleek operation'.

There were effective systems in place to reduce the risk and spread of infection. On the day of the inspection the practice was clean and well maintained.

No formal supervision or appraisals took place however we were told that because the practice was contained within one treatment room any new developments relating to their practice or issues with the processes would be addressed and acted upon straight away. Staff we spoke with told us they felt supported by the dentist and were encouraged to identify and follow up on training relevant to their practice. Informal staff meetings were held to discuss the operational running of the practice and any patient issues.

There were arrangements to monitor the quality of the practice to record for example details of any complaints and accidents were recorded. Patient views on the quality of the practice were not formally obtained. However staff told us they managed informal concerns raised by patients as quickly as possible to prevent these from escalating.