• Doctor
  • Independent doctor

Archived: Whiteson Hair Loss Consultancy Ltd

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

The Old Hall Clinic, 14 Old Hall Road, Gatley, Cheshire, SK8 4BE 07970 859229

Provided and run by:
Whiteson Hair Loss Consultancy Ltd

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile
Important: This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile

All Inspections

5 Nov 2019

During a routine inspection

This service is rated as Good overall. (Previous inspection October 2018 was a comprehensive un-rated inspection, where we judged the service to be compliant with regulations.)
The key questions are rated as:
Are services safe? – Good
Are services effective? – Good
Are services caring? – Good
Are services responsive? – Good
Are services well-led? – Good

We carried out this comprehensive inspection at Whiteson Hairloss Consultancy limited under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the service was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008.

Whiteson Hair Loss Consultancy Ltd provides treatment for men and women over 18 years of age who are experiencing hair loss. Seventeen patients provided feedback about the service; all comments were positive about the service provided, many describing Dr Whiteson as being extremely caring and professional.

Our key findings were:

  • The service had good systems to manage risk so that safety incidents were less likely to happen.
  • The service routinely reviewed the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care it provided. It ensured that care and treatment was delivered according to evidence-based guidelines.
  • Appropriate medical records were maintained.
  • Dr Whiteson involved and treated people with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
  • Patients could access care and treatment from the service within an appropriate timescale for their needs.
  • There was a strong focus on continuous learning and improvement.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available. We found the systems and processes in place to manage and investigate complaints were effective.
  • The service proactively sought feedback from staff and clients, which it acted on.


The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Update safeguarding procedures to include the direct contact details of the local safeguarding team.
  • Maintain accurate records of portable equipment testing


Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

1 October 2018

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection on 1 October 2018 to ask the service the following key questions; Are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this service was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this service was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this service was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this service was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this service was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the service was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008.

Our key findings were:

  • There were appropriate safety systems in place to ensure patients were kept safe.
  • Care and treatment was provided in line with national guidance.
  • Comprehensive patient records were maintained, demonstrating effective review of care and treatment.
  • There were policies and protocols in place to ensure effective governance of the service.
  • Patient feedback was consistently, highly complementary about the service.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP

Chief Inspector of General Practice