The Care Quality Commission
  • Dentist
  • Dentist

The Ivy Dental Practice

161 Wellington Road South, Stockport, Greater Manchester, SK1 3UA (0161) 480 2913

Provided and run by:
The Ivy Dental Practice Limited

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

We carried out this announced on-site inspection on 6 October 2026.

We found the practice had met regulations.

The practice had effective systems to identify and manage risks, including infection prevention and control.

Staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to carry out their roles.

Recruitment procedures reflected current legislation and there was effective leadership and a culture of continuous improvement.

Staff provided care and treatment in line with current guidance. They treated patients with dignity and respect and ensured access to care, support, and treatment when required.

The Ivy Dental Practice is in Stockport, Manchester and provides private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There was step-free access from the rear of the practice and car parking spaces available, including dedicated parking for disabled people, near the practice.

The practice had 3 treatment rooms. At the time of our inspection, there was a total of 12 staff, of which there were 4 dentists, 4 qualified dental nurses, 2 dental hygienists, 1 practice manager and 1 operations manager. We gathered feedback from staff and spoke to a range of staff during our inspection, including 2 dentists, 2 dental nurses, 1 dental hygienist, and the operations manager.

The service provides cosmetic treatments, some of which are not in scope of CQC regulation and are not covered in our inspection.

12 February 2014

During a routine inspection

We visited The Ivy Dental Practice on 12 February 2014. The ground floor was accessible to patients with mobility difficulties, via a ramp to the rear entrance.

All areas were clean and tidy and there was clear signage. There was a practice leaflet containing patient information and oral hygiene products were available for patients to purchase. Staff were helpful and friendly and treated patients with respect.

Emergency medical equipment was in place and staff undertook annual training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).. Decontamination processes were followed and hygiene procedures adhered to, helping minimise the risk of cross infection.

We looked at a sample of electronic records, which contained up to date medical information. Patients were provided with explanations of their treatment options and given time to make an informed decision.

Staff had access to continual training and development. We spoke with two members of staff who felt well supported in their employment.

We spoke with three patients who were positive about the treatment they received. One patient said, 'Staff are always happy to answer any questions'. Another described the staff as 'Very good, helpful and friendly'.

There was a complaints procedure, summarised in the patient leaflet. Patient feedback was sought in various ways and results were used to inform improvements to the service. Audits were regularly undertaken, but some of these needed to be formalised and recorded.