• Dentist
  • Dentist

The Dental Surgery Burnham Limited

43-45 High Street, Burnham, Slough, Buckinghamshire, SL1 7JD (01628) 664614

Provided and run by:
The Dental Surgery Burnham Limited

All Inspections

30 May 2023

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a follow up focused inspection of The Dental Surgery Burnham on 30 May 2023. This inspection was carried out to review the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements.

The inspection was carried out by a CQC inspector.

We had previously undertaken an inspection of The Dental Surgery Burnham on 12 April 2023 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions.

We found the registered provider was not providing well-led care and was in breach of regulation 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.

You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for The Dental Surgery Burnham on our website www.cqc.org.uk .

When 1 or more of the 5 questions are not met, we require the service to make improvements and send us an action plan.

We then inspect again after a reasonable interval, focusing on the areas where improvement was required.

As part of this inspection, we asked:

  • Is it well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breach we found at our inspection on 12 April 2023.

Background

The Dental Surgery Burnham is in Burnham Village and provides NHS and private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There is step free access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces, including dedicated parking for disabled people, are available near the practice. The practice has made reasonable adjustments to support patients with access requirements.

The dental team includes 6 dentists, 1 periodontist, 1 endodontist, 1 oral surgeon, 7 dental nurses, 3 dental hygienists, 1 practice manager and 3 receptionists.

The practice has 7 treatment rooms.

During the inspection we spoke with 1 dentist and the practice manager.

We looked at practice policies, procedures and other records to assess how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

  • Monday 8.30am to 5.30pm
  • Tuesday 8.30am to 5.30pm
  • Wednesday 8.30am to 5.30pm
  • Thursday 8.30am to 5.30pm
  • Friday 8.30am to 5.30pm
  • Saturday Private appointments

12 April 2023

During a routine inspection

We carried out this announced comprehensive inspection on 12 April 2023 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions.

We planned the inspection to check whether the registered practice was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations.

The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspector who was supported by two specialist dental advisors.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following 5 questions:

  • Is it safe?
  • Is it effective?
  • Is it caring?
  • Is it responsive to people’s needs?
  • Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

  • The dental clinic appeared clean and well-maintained.
  • The practice had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • Staff knew how to deal with medical emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available.
  • Improvements were needed to systems to manage risks for patients, staff, equipment and the premises.
  • Safeguarding processes were in place and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.
  • The practice had staff recruitment procedures which reflected current legislation.
  • Clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Patients were treated with dignity and respect.
  • Improvements were needed to protocols to protect patients’ privacy and personal information.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The appointment system worked efficiently to respond to patients’ needs.
  • The frequency of appointments was agreed between the dentist and the patient, giving due regard to National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines.
  • There was effective culture of continuous improvement.
  • Staff felt involved, supported and worked as a team.
  • Staff and patients were asked for feedback about the services provided.
  • Complaints were dealt with positively and efficiently.
  • The practice’s information governance arrangements required improvement.

Background

The Dental Surgery Burnham is in Burnham Village and provides NHS and private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There is step free access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces, including dedicated parking for disabled people, are available near the practice. The practice has made reasonable adjustments to support patients with access requirements.

The dental team includes 6 dentists, 1 periodontist, 1 endodontist, 1 oral surgeon, 7 dental nurses, 3 dental hygienists, 1 practice manager and 3 receptionists.

The practice has 7 treatment rooms.

During the inspection we spoke with 4 dentists, 2 dental nurses, 1 dental hygienist, 1 receptionist and the practice manager.

We looked at practice policies, procedures and other records to assess how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

  • Monday 8.30am to 5.30pm
  • Tuesday 8.30am to 5.30pm
  • Wednesday 8.30am to 5.30pm
  • Thursday 8.30am to 5.30pm
  • Friday 8.30am to 5.30pm
  • Saturday Private appointments

We identified regulations the provider was not complying with.

They must:

  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

Full details of the regulation the provider was/is not meeting are at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements.

They should:

  • Improve the practice protocols regarding auditing patient dental care records to check that necessary information is recorded.

  • Improve the practice protocols to ensure patient referrals to other dental or health care professionals are centrally monitored to ensure they are received in a timely manner and not lost.

The provider accepted the shortfalls that we raised and took immediate action on the day of our inspection to begin to address these.

Where evidence is sent that shows the relevant issues have been acted on, we have stated this in our report, but we cannot say that the practice is compliant for that key question as this would not be an accurate reflection of what was found on the day of our inspection.

8 October 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with four people who had appointments on the day of our visit. They were very positive about the standard of dental care they received. They told us they were always given full details of treatment options open to them. They said they were not under any pressure to choose one option over another, felt able to ask any questions they wanted and to take whatever time they needed before they made a decision. One person told us after their treatment "It was a pleasure to come!"

We looked at patient records for new and long-standing patients. They included medical histories which were checked and updated at the start of any new treatment or check-ups. This ensured dental care was provided taking into account the implications of any underlying or temporary health conditions.

We found the practice had policies and procedures in place and being followed to prevent the spread and control of infection. We confirmed from records staff were trained in infection control and there was a lead infection control person identified to promote and maintain good practice.

We saw records which confirmed equipment had been serviced as required and that the date for the next service had not passed. This showed people were protected from unsafe or unsuitable equipment because the provider had put in place systems and procedures for the maintenance of equipment used.

We saw there were regular internal audits carried out and minutes of staff meetings showed the quality of service and how it could be improved was part of staff discussions.

We saw assessments were in place to address specific risks, for example from use of X-rays and cross-contamination.