• Care Home
  • Care home

Anchor Point Neurological Centre-Inspire Neurocare (Southampton) Limited

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Hurst Way, Nursling, Southampton, SO16 0AZ (023) 8001 4567

Provided and run by:
Inspire Neurocare (Southampton) Limited

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Our current view of the service

Good

Updated 9 June 2026

Date of Assessment: 15 and 16 July 2026. Inspire Neuro Care Southampton provides accommodation with nursing care for up to 57 people with acquired brain injuries. Accommodation is arranged over 3 floors with stair and lift access. At the time of this inspection there were 12 people living at the service. Our inspection was prompted by concerns received about how safely people’s needs were being met. This was a comprehensive inspection, and we reviewed all the quality statements. We found no concerns in relation to the care and support people received. However, we noted some further embedding of governance and oversight was needed.

There was a new manager in post who had worked closely with external stakeholders to monitor and improve safety. Records showed staff were skilled, qualified, and experienced to meet people’s needs. Staff had been given updated training and competency assessments, and this included agency staff regularly working at the service. Staff we spoke with confirmed they felt more confident and competent than previously. Safeguarding procedures were followed and effective systems were in place to manage concerns. Lessons learned from incidents were recorded and shared with the wider team. Staff told us they felt confident to raise concerns about safety and were sure they would be listened to. The manager had implemented a range of checks and audits, alongside the provider's regular checks and audits. These showed how assurances had been sought. However, further embedding of these systems was required as the service grew and developed.

People’s needs and rehabilitation goals were assessed and reviewed regularly. Staff worked with healthcare professionals and monitored people’s outcomes and ongoing health to promote wellbeing. Risk assessments were completed and care plans provided clear guidance to staff on maintaining people’s safety. Records showed people received enough food and drink to maintain their health.

Medicines were managed safely, and safety checks were carried out across the premises and on all equipment. Fire risks were assessed and appropriately managed.

The service was clean and well maintained.

Staff all spoke highly of the manager. Staff told us the management team were open with them about recent issues, and they had been involved in some of the improvements. A staff member said, “[Manager] is good at asking staff, ‘what do you think of this.’ For me, she values input from the staff which is good.” The manager told us “We're improving. We have better oversight. I do think we have the foundations here to make something really amazing.”

People's experience of the service

Updated 9 June 2026

The service had been through a period of oversight from stakeholders and there were improvement plans in place. People and their relatives were aware of this. A person’s relative said, “When [name] first came here, the home was on a bit of a learning curve, but my perception is the staff are better. Staff have always been diligent, but lacked confidence, but they are now better trained, and very competent.” Other relatives we spoke with told us they had also seen improvements.

People told us they felt safe living at the service. Overall, people told us they felt there were enough staff on duty to meet their needs. People spoke highly of the staff. A person told us “I can’t stress enough the wonderful emotional support the staff give me and the gentle encouragement. They have always listened to me fully and act on my preferences.” People and their relatives consistently described staff as “good” and “kind.” A person’s relative said, “They are all kind and very respectful.”

Staff supported people to make choices about their care, and care plans contained clear information aimed at promoting independence and rehabilitation where possible. The service regularly sought feedback through meetings and surveys. An activities co-ordinator was in post who aimed to deliver a varied programme of social and recreational activities.

People were provided with sufficient food and drink and told us the food was “Great.” They said their preferences were met and there was plenty of choice available.

People told us they were supported by staff to access hospital and medical appointments.

We observed staff interacting with people in a considerate and respectful manner. The service had a friendly and welcoming atmosphere which many relatives commented on.