• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Vintage Revelations Gloucestershire

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

B12a Kestrel Court, Waterwells Drive, Gloucester, GL2 2AT (01452) 947520

Provided and run by:
Vintage Revelations Limited

Important:

We served a warning notice on Vintage Revelations Limited on 2 June 2026 for failing to meet the regulations related to good governance at Vintage Revelations Gloucestershire.

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Our current view of the service

Requires improvement

Updated 24 March 2026

This assessment took place between 20 April and 15 May 2026.

Vintage Revelations Gloucestershire is registered to deliver homecare and provides the regulated activity of personal care to people living in their own homes. CQC only inspects the service being received by people provided with 'personal care’; such as help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of our inspection there were 49 people using the service who were receiving personal care.

This service had not been inspected since their registration; therefore, we assessed all quality statements across the safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led key questions. As a result of our inspection, we rated the service as requires improvement. The provider was in breach of the legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment, notifying CQC of incidents and good governance.

There were 2 registered managers in post who were supported by several key senior staff to run the management of the service, staff training and recruitment. We discussed our assessment findings with the registered managers to enable them to begin to act. They said they were committed to improve the quality of the service and had started to implement changes.

The providers systems to monitor the quality of care being delivered, the completeness of people’s care, medicine records and staff recruitment records had not been effective in identifying shortfalls.

People’s care and medicines records were not always complete or accurate. Staff did not always have access to information describing the measures needed to mitigate people’s personal risks. People’s care plans and daily records were not consistently reviewed to ensure people’s support requirements were accurately reflected in their care records. We found inconsistencies in people’s medicines administration records; protocols were not in place for medicines to be administered ‘as required’ or people’s topical creams.

Staff felt well trained and supported. However, some staff reported concerns about the management of their care call rotas, and some reported they had not received regular supervision meetings in line with the provider’s policies. The provider had not ensured recruitment checks of staff who had transferred from a previous care provider had been completed.

The registered managers were visible within the service and worked well with staff. They were passionate about delivering a homecare service to local people. They valued their workforce and appreciated feedback from all stakeholders.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

In instances where CQC has begun a process of regulatory action, we may publish this information on our website after any representations and/or appeals have been concluded, if the action has been taken forward.

 

 

 

 

People's experience of the service

Updated 24 March 2026

People and their relatives told us they were treated with kindness, empathy and compassion. People were supported to access healthcare services and their community as needed to maintain their independence and wellbeing.

We received mixed comments from people and their relatives about their experiences of the service. Some comments were positive and we received comments such as, “Well it varies, the care is OK, but the timekeeping is awful”; “Mostly it’s fine” and “The carers are very good, they are all very nice.” However, others described the service as inconsistent; expressing concerns about the timeliness of their care calls, the communication from the office and their involvement in the development of their care plans. One person said, “I have got the App on my phone, so I can see who is coming and when, but I don’t get a set time which would be nice, and even with the App they are usually three quarters of an hour late.”

While people and relatives expressed general satisfaction with their care and treatment, our assessment found elements of care and support did not always meet the expected standards.