• Doctor
  • GP practice

Archived: The Penrhyn Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

2A Penrhyn Avenue, London, E17 5DB

Provided and run by:
Dr Olukayode Adeyemi Oremakinde

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile
Important: The provider of this service changed - see old profile

All Inspections

14 March 2018

During a routine inspection

This practice is rated as Good overall. (Previous inspection 01 2016 – Good)

The key questions are rated as:

Are services safe? – Good

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? - Good

As part of our inspection process, we also look at the quality of care for specific population groups. The population groups are rated as:

Older People – Good

People with long-term conditions – Good

Families, children and young people – Good

Working age people (including those recently retired and students – Good

People whose circumstances may make them vulnerable – Good

People experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia) – Good

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at The Penrhyn Surgery on 14 March 2018 as part of our inspection programme.

At this inspection we found:

  • The practice had clear systems to manage risk so that safety incidents were less likely to happen. When incidents did happen, the practice learned from them and improved their processes.

  • The practice routinely reviewed the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care it provided. It ensured that care and treatment was delivered according to evidence- based guidelines.

  • There was evidence of quality improvement and the practice made good use of clinical audits.

  • Clinical guidelines and patient safety alerts were discussed in clinical meetings where learning was shared.

  • Staff involved and treated patients with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

  • Patients found the appointment system easy to use and reported that they were able to access care when they needed it.

  • The practice had clear systems for acting on responding to and learning from complaints.

  • The practice carried out annual risk assessments including infection prevention and control, health and safety and fire safety.

  • There was a strong focus on continuous learning and improvement at all levels of the organisation.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

26 January 2016

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at The Penryhn Surgery on 26 January 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • Not all patients said they found it easy to make a routine appointment with a GP, but the practice was actively working alongside the patients to improve the appointment system and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.

The areas where the provider should make improvement are:

  • Continue the programme of audit and work with the patient participation group to improve the appointment system making GP appointments more easily accessible.

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP

Chief Inspector of General Practice