• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Hillfield House

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Hillfield Lane, Burton on Trent, Staffordshire, DE13 0BW (01283) 567320

Provided and run by:
GreenSquareAccord Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile
Important: This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile

All Inspections

5 July 2017

During a routine inspection

Hillfield House provides accommodation and residential care for up to 34 people who may be living with dementia. At the time of the inspection there were 32 people using the service.

At the last inspection on 1 October 2015, the service was rated Good. At this inspection we found the service remained Good.

People felt safe with the staff that supported them. People were supported to keep safe as identified risks were managed in a way that ensured risks to people were minimised, whilst promoting their rights and choices. People were supported to take their medicine when needed in a safe way. People were protected from the risk of harm as staff understood what constituted abuse or poor practice. Checks were made before employment to confirm staff were of good character and suitable to work in a care environment.

People’s needs and choices were met as there was sufficient staff available who received training and supervision to support and develop their skills. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible. People were supported by a consistent staff team that knew them well and promoted their independence. Staff understood people’s preferred communication method and the support they needed to make their own decisions. When people were unable to consent to specific decisions they were supported in their best interest.

People’s needs were assessed and support plans where developed with them and their representatives to enable them to be supported in their preferred way. There were regular reviews of people’s care to ensure it accurately reflected their needs.

People were supported to maintain a diet that met their dietary requirements and received support from health care professionals to ensure their well-being was maintained. Health concerns were monitored to ensure people received specialist health care intervention when this was needed.

Staff were kind and caring when supporting people and knew their likes and dislikes.

People were supported to participate in social activities. People told us that they liked the staff and we saw that people’s privacy was respected by the staff team. The staff and management team made visitors feel welcome and were approachable. People were treated with respect and supported to maintain their dignity. The staff worked in partnership with people when supporting them.

There were processes in place for people to raise concerns and express their views and opinions about the service provided. There were systems in place to monitor the quality of the service to enable the registered manager and provider to drive improvement.

Further information is in the detailed findings below.

1 October 2015

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 1 October 2015 and was unannounced. The home had been purchased and registered with a new provider in May 2015. This was the first inspection since registration.

The service provides accommodation and personal care for up to 34 older people living with dementia. Twenty eight people were living at the home on the day of our inspection.

The service had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People told us they felt safe at the home and staff understood how to protect people from abuse and were responsive to their needs. People were protected against the risk of abuse, as checks were made to confirm staff were of good character to work with people. Sufficient staff were available to meet people's needs.

Risks to people’s health and welfare were assessed and care plans were in place that minimised the identified risks which ensured people were supported in a safe way. People had equipment in place when needed, so that staff could assist them safely.

Staff were provided with training to support them to meet the needs of people they cared for. People were supported to maintain good health and accessed the services of health professionals when needed.

The manager understood their responsibility to comply with the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). Staff knew about people’s individual capacity to make decisions and supported people to make their own decisions.

Risks to people’s nutrition were minimised because staff understood the importance of offering appetising meals that were suitable for people’s individual dietary requirements and preferences.

People told us staff were caring. Staff understood people’s needs and abilities and reassured and encouraged them in a way that respected their dignity and promoted their independence.

The provider had systems in place to assess and monitor the quality of the service, so that actions could be put in place to make improvements where needed. There were systems in place to supervise and manage all staff, to ensure their practice was monitored and to identify when additional support or training was required. Positive communication was encouraged and people’s feedback was sought by the registered manager to further develop the service and drive improvement. The management of the service was open and transparent.