• Dentist
  • Dentist

Archived: North Road Dental Surgery

22 North Road, Boldon Colliery, Tyne and Wear, NE35 9AR (0191) 537 4878

Provided and run by:
Mr. Gavin Cowie

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

17 March 2020

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a follow up desk based inspection of 17 March 2020. This inspection was carried out to review in detail the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements.

The inspection was undertaken by a CQC inspector as desk-based review.

We undertook a comprehensive inspection of North Road Dental Surgery on 3 December 2019 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found the registered provider was not providing well led care and was in breach of regulations 12 and 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for North Road Dental Surgery on our website www.cqc.org.uk.

As part of this inspection we asked:

• Is it well-led?

When one or more of the five questions are not met we require the service to make improvements and send us an action plan. We then inspect again after a reasonable interval, focusing on the areas where improvement was required.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 17 March 2020.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 17 March 2019.

Background

North Road Dental Surgery is in Boldon and provides NHS and private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

Access for wheelchair users or people with pushchairs is possible via a portable ramp at the front entrance. Car parking spaces are available near the practice.

The dental team includes two principal dentists, an associate dentist, a dental hygiene therapist, four qualified dental nurses (one of whom is the practice manager) and two trainee dental nurses. Dental nurses carry out reception duties. The practice has three treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by an individual who is one of the principal dentists there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

The practice is open: Monday and Friday 8.30am to 5pm,Tuesday 9am to 6pm, Wednesday and Thursday 9am to 5pm, Saturday 9am to 12pm .

Our key findings were:

  • Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were now in place and available in line with national guidance. Regular checks were in place to ensure medical emergency equipment was in place.
  • Improvements had been made to staff training in sepsis awareness.
  • Risks associated with the X-ray equipment had been reassessed and measures put in place to further eliminate risk
  • Awareness of safety incidents had been increased and learning from events shared at team meetings.
  • Improvements had been made to audits, increasing frequency of X-ray and infection controls audits and other audits being introduced.

3 December 2019

During a routine inspection

We carried out this announced inspection on 3 December 2019 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission, (CQC), inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

North Road Dental Surgery is in Boldon and provides NHS and private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

Access for wheelchair users or people with pushchairs is possible via a portable ramp at the front entrance. Car parking spaces are available near the practice.

The dental team includes two principal dentists, an associate dentist, a dental hygiene therapist, four qualified dental nurses (one of whom is the practice manager) and two trainee dental nurses. Dental nurses carry out reception duties. The practice has three treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by an individual who is one of the principal dentists there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

On the day of inspection, we collected two CQC comment cards filled in by patients.

During the inspection we spoke with three dentists, three dental nurses and the practice manager. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Monday and Friday 8.30am to 5pm

Tuesday 9am to 6pm

Wednesday and Thursday 9am to 5pm

Saturday 9am to 12pm

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared to be visibly clean and well-maintained.
  • The provider had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment was not available in line with national guidance. Items were ordered the following day.
  • The provider had limited systems to help them manage risk to patients and staff. We discussed the need to improve their existing risk management protocols in relation to radiography, medical emergencies, significant events and sepsis awareness.
  • The provider had safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.
  • The provider had staff recruitment procedures which reflected current legislation.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information. The provider should ensure staff and patient information is not accessible to unauthorised people.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The appointment system took account of patients’ needs.
  • The provider should review their leadership, to promote a culture of continuous improvement.
  • Staff felt involved and supported and worked as a team.
  • The provider asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The provider dealt with complaints positively and efficiently.
  • The provider had information governance arrangements.

We identified regulations the provider was not complying with. They must:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.
  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

Full details of the regulations the provider is not meeting are at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Improve and develop staff awareness of the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and ensure all staff are aware of their responsibilities under the Act as it relates to their role.
  • Take action to ensure the clinicians take into account the guidance provided by the Faculty of General Dental Practice when carrying out X-rays.
  • Take action to ensure the practice stores accident records relating to people employed and service users, in compliance with legislation and current guidance.

22 December 2016

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection on 22 December 2016 to ask the practice the following key questions; Are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

North Road dental practice has been providing NHS dental treatment for over 10 years to patients of all ages. The practice is situated in a residential area in Boldon, Tyne and Wear. There are three treatment rooms, a dedicated decontamination room for sterilising dental instruments, two waiting areas, a reception and a staff kitchen. Car parking is available on the side streets near the practice. Access for wheelchair users or pushchairs is possible via a portable ramp at the front entrance.

The practice is open

Monday and Friday 0830 -1700, Tuesday 0900 -1800, Wednesday & Thursday 0900 -1700 and alternative Saturdays 0900 - 1200. 

The dental team is comprised of two principal dentists, an associate dentist, a dental hygienist, five receptionist/qualified dental nurses (one of whom is the practice manager) and two trainee dental nurses.

The practice owner is registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) as an individual. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the practice is run.

We reviewed 25 CQC comment cards on the day of our visit; patients were very positive about the staff and standard of care provided by the practice. Patients commented they felt involved in all aspects of their care and found the staff to be helpful, respectful, friendly and were treated in a clean and tidy environment.

Our key findings were:

  • Staff were very friendly and enthusiastic about their work.
  • The practice was visibly clean and free from clutter.
  • The practice had systems for recording incidents and accidents.
  • Staff received annual medical emergency training.
  • Dental professionals provided treatment in accordance with current professional guidelines.
  • Patients could access urgent care when required.
  • Complaints were dealt with in an efficient and positive manner.
  • An Infection prevention and control policy was in place. We saw sterilisation procedures followed recommended guidance.
  • The provider did not have all emergency medicines and equipment in line with Resuscitation Council (UK) and the British National Formulary (BNF) guidance for medical emergencies in dental practice.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements and should:

  • Review the practice’s arrangements for receiving and responding to patient safety alerts, recalls and rapid response reports issued from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and through the Central Alerting System (CAS), as well as from other relevant bodies such as, Public Health England (PHE).
  • Review availability, management and storage of medicines and equipment to manage medical emergencies giving due regard to guidelines issued by the Resuscitation Council (UK), the General Dental Council (GDC) standards for the dental team and the British National Formulary (BNF) guidance for medical emergencies in dental practice.
  • Review the security of prescription pads in the practice and ensure there are systems in place to monitor and track their use.
  • Review the practice responsibilities in regards to the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health (COSHH) Regulations 2002 to ensure all documentation is present and up to date and staff understand how to minimise risks associated with the use of and handling of these substances.
  • Review its audit protocols to document learning points that are shared with all relevant staff and ensure that the resulting improvements can be demonstrated as part of the audit process.
  • Review the need to install emergency lighting within the premises in accordance with the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005.
  • Review the practice’s procedures and protocols for ensuring staff have access to medical emergency equipment whilst undertaking domiciliary visits.
  • Review the requirements by the Department of Health in Information Governance training and learning.

9 December 2013

During a routine inspection

When we looked at how the people who were using the service were supported to express their views and be involved in making decisions about their care and treatment. We found detailed records and on speaking to them they told us; 'I have had my treatment explained clearly to me.' There were detailed treatment plans and patient records which included the options discussed and the reasons for the selection of the treatment delivered.

Peoples' needs were assessed and the treatment was planned and delivered to address peoples' individual needs. Patients told us that they were pleased with the care and; 'the practice has been fantastic.'

People were protected from the risk of infection because appropriate guidance had been followed for example a well organised and well managed decontamination room. Staff we spoke with understood how to follow best practice guidance for reducing the risk of cross infection.

People were cared for, or supported by, suitably qualified, skilled and experienced staff who had been subject to a selection process and had been checked to make sure they were suitable to deliver the service safely.