• Dentist
  • Dentist

Archived: Hartswood Dental Practice

39-41 Prices Lane, Reigate, Surrey, RH2 8BA (01737) 245693

Provided and run by:
Mrs. Jacqueline Hatton

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

3 November 2022

During a routine inspection

We carried out this announced comprehensive inspection on 3 November 2022 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered practice was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following 5 questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

  • The dental clinic appeared to be visibly clean and well-maintained.
  • The practice had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • Staff knew how to deal with medical emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available.
  • The practice had systems to help them manage risk to patients and staff.
  • Safeguarding processes were in place and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.
  • The practice had staff recruitment procedures which reflected current legislation.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Patients were treated with dignity and respect and staff took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The appointment system took account of patients’ needs.
  • There was effective leadership and a culture of continuous improvement.
  • Staff felt involved and supported and worked as a team.
  • Staff and patients were asked for feedback about the services provided.
  • Complaints were dealt with positively and efficiently.
  • The dental clinic had information governance arrangements.

Background

Hartswood Dental Practice is in Woodhatch in Surrey and provides NHS and private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There is level access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces are available near the practice on surrounding roads.

The dental team includes a principal dentist, 4 associate dentists, 5 dental nurses, 2 dental hygienists, and 2 receptionists. The practice has 5 treatment rooms.

During the inspection we spoke with the principal dentist, one of the associate dentists, 2 dental nurses, 1 dental hygienist, 1 receptionist and the practice manager. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

8.30am to 5pm Monday to Fridays

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Take action to ensure audits of radiography are undertaken at regular intervals to improve the quality of the service. Practice should also ensure that, where appropriate, audits have documented learning points and the resulting improvements can be demonstrated.
  • Take action to implement any recommendations in the practice's fire safety risk assessment and ensure ongoing fire safety management is effective.

Implement a system to ensure patient referrals to other dental or health care professionals are centrally monitored to ensure they are received in a timely manner and not lost.

During a check to make sure that the improvements required had been made

At our last inspection in September 2013 the provider did not have an effective system to monitor, detect and prevent the risk of Legionella infection within the practice. On the 21 April 2014 we undertook a desk top review of this service. We reviewed the areas of concern and gathered evidence in relation to cleanliness and infection control.

We undertook a review of records and information the provider has submitted to the Care Quality Commission in relation to Legionella infection risk and prevention. We found the provider met the standards.

People were protected from the risk of infection because appropriate guidance had been followed and effective systems were in place. We found that the provider had sought professional advice in relation to the prevention of the Legionella infection. We saw records of an appropriate risk assessment and action plan. Corrective action had been taken by the practice to address the shortfalls within this assessment. We noted that regular environmental testing had also been implemented to reduce the risk of infection.

6 September 2013

During a routine inspection

As part of our inspection we spoke with four patients. Patients were complimentary about the staff and practice. One patient said "It's a fantastic practice; they are really good people ' everyone from the receptionists to the nurses to the dentists. Everyone is always so nice'.

Patients who used the service were given appropriate information and support regarding their care and treatment.

We reviewed the care records for five patients and saw that records included details of each patient's medical history. We saw that these were verbally checked by the Registered Dentists at each treatment visit and any changes recorded in the patient's records. We also saw that the Registered Dentists completed and recorded a full oral examination before proceeding with any treatment.

We saw documents which confirmed that all professionally practicing staff employed by the service held relevant current registrations with the General Dental Council (GDC). We also saw documents which confirmed that the provider held checks with the disclosure and barring service (DBS) for all staff.

The provider was not able to demonstrate that they had suitable arrangements in place to reduce the risks of exposure to legionella.

Patients and their representatives were asked for their views about their care and treatment. We saw that this was done through a comments box and a yearly survey. Comments included 'Friendly, helpful and good knowledgeable staff' and 'I feel comfortable with my dentist and always feel comfortable during my treatment'.