• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Eleanor Nursing and Social Care Ltd - Pantiles House

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

30 Langley Road, Merton Park, London, SW19 3AN (020) 8690 2406

Provided and run by:
Eleanor Nursing and Social Care Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Our current view of the service

Good

Updated 22 April 2025

Date of Assessment: 29 April 2025.

Eleanor Nursing and Social Care Ltd - Pantiles House is a service that provides care and support to people living in specialist 'extra care' housing. Extra care housing provides people with their own self-contained accommodation in a shared site or building. The accommodation is bought or rented and is the occupant’s own home. People’s care and housing are provided under separate contractual agreements. The Care Quality Commission (CQC) does not regulate premises used for extra care housing.

At the time of this inspection 10 older people who received personal care and support were living in this extra care housing scheme. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC onlyinspects where people receive personal care.

The service was registered with us on 22 July 2024 and this is their first inspection since being taken over as a new provider. The last rating for the service under the previous provider was good [published 7 June 2022].

This inspection was conducted by 2 CQC Adult Social Care inspectors and was announced.

We looked at all 5 key questions, Is the service safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led? Based on the findings of this schemes inaugural CQC inspection we have rated them good overall.

However, we also found a few issues that needed improving which we discussed with the managers at the time of this inspection. This included people not always being supported to plan for important life changes, such as the end of their life. The managers acknowledged the issue and agreed to take appropriate action to ask people about their end of life care wishes and record the outcome of those discussions. In addition, information about people’s communication needs was not always identified and included in their care plan and nor were people always offered information in formats that were tailored to meet their preferred method of communication. The managers also agreed to take appropriate steps to address these communication issues.

These issues described above notwithstanding, the service supported people to stay safe. Staff understood and managed risk well. The environment was clean and a comfortable place for people to live. Staff recruitment practices were safe. There were enough staff with the right levels of knowledge, skills, and experience to safely meet people’s needs. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. Staff were valued and supported with their learning and development, as well as wellbeing. Managers ensured staff received all the relevant and update training and supported they needed to perform their roles and responsibilities well. Infection risks were managed well. Staff also managed medicines safely.

People were involved in assessments of their needs. They monitored people’s health to support healthy living. Staff made sure people understood their care and support needs which enabled them to give informed consent. Staff involved those important to people to make decisions in people’s best interests where they did not have capacity.

People were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff protected their privacy and dignity. They treated them as individuals and supported their preferences. People had choice in their care and were encouraged to maintain relationships with family and friends. Staff responded to people in a timely way. The service supported staff wellbeing.

People were involved in decisions about their care. People knew how to give feedback and were confident the service took it seriously and acted on it. People received fair and equal care and treatment.

The management of the service was consistent and stable. Managers were visible, knowledgeable and supportive of staff. Staff felt supported to give feedback and were treated equally, free from bullying or harassment. Managers and staff had a shared vision and culture based on listening, learning and trust. Governance systems were operated effectively. Managers investigated incidents thoroughly. Records well-maintained and managed. The service had a good learning culture of improvement and inclusivity which had led to people experiencing positive outcomes. People knew how to speak up and were confident the service took their feedback seriously and acted upon it. Managers and staff worked in partnership with external health and social care professionals and bodies to deliver the best possible care and support to people.

People's experience of the service

Updated 22 April 2025

During our assessment we received in-person verbal or email feedback from 4 people living at the scheme, a visiting relative and 2 external health and social care professionals. We also spoke to various leaders and staff who worked at the scheme including, the registered manager, a senior regional manager, the team leader/deputy manager and 2 care staff.

People were positive about the quality of the care provided at the service. People said they were happy living there and described the culture within the scheme as open, friendly and welcoming. People said staff always treated them with respect and kindness, and made sure any personal care was provided sensitively, preserving their privacy and dignity. Typical comments included, “It’s really good living here…The staff are all lovely”, “The staff are so caring and kind. They treat me so well” and “My [family member] is well looked after at Pantiles House by the very kind and considerate staff who work there”. We observed people were included and listened to by managers and staff who consistently interacted positively with them.

People’s safety was prioritised and staff knew how to keep people safe from abuse or harm. A relative said, “My [family member] is absolutely safe living here.”

People were supported by staff who were skilled and experienced and provided care in line with their choices and preferences.

People were complimentary about the way the care home was led by the managers. People described the managers as accessible, approachable and friendly. People also described how staff supported them to maintain their independence.