- Homecare service
Medsolve (UK) Limited
Assessment report published 4 February 2026
Contents
On this page
- Overview
- Assessing needs
- Delivering evidence-based care and treatment
- How staff, teams and services work together
- Supporting people to live healthier lives
- Monitoring and improving outcomes
- Consent to care and treatment
Effective
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
This is the first inspection of this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
This service scored 75 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.
Assessing needs
Staff made sure people’s care and treatment was effective by assessing and reviewing their health, care, well-being and communication needs with them. Guidance on how to support people with specific needs was incorporated into ongoing assessment of needs. When needs changed, so did the assessment and the guidance for staff. The registered manager met with people and their relatives before packages of care started to ensure their needs could be met by the service. A relative commented, “At first we had a meeting with 2 of the managers who came to our house and went through everything with me.”
Delivering evidence-based care and treatment
Staff planned and delivered people’s care and treatment with them, including what was important and mattered to them. They did this in line with legislation and current evidence-based good practice and standards. Care plans were developed for each identified care need and staff had guidance on how to meet those needs. Staff applied learning effectively in line with best practice, which led to good outcomes for people and supported a better quality of life. A professional commented, “My experience of Medsolve has been positive when reviewing my patient who is under their care. From an enteral feeding perspective, plans are appropriately followed by carers and they seem organised in overseeing the tube feed.”
How staff, teams and services work together
Staff at the service worked well across teams and services to support people. They made sure people only needed to tell their story once by sharing their assessment of needs when people moved between different services. The service had systems in place for staff to communicate with each other which enabled them to effectively deliver people’s care and support. A staff member commented, “Changes are communicated through care plan updates, handovers, and direct communication with management and healthcare professionals.” Staff made timely referrals and worked well with other agencies to ensure people's treatment needs were met. A relative commented, “Staff work with all of our specialists. We have got a new sensory programme, I brought in with a specialist occupational therapist OT, and all the staff are really receptive to it.”
Supporting people to live healthier lives
Staff at the service supported people to live healthier lives and where possible, reduce their future needs for care and support. Staff had the knowledge and written guidance to monitor and identify a deterioration in a person’s health. A relative told us, “The clinical lead phones the GP for any changes in the medicine. Anything is flagged up if it’s needed.” Records showed people received regular health checks, and included any specialist advice and guidance, that had been obtained where people had additional support needs, such as, from the GP or physiotherapist. A relative commented, “I did a review with the staff. They discussed everything, we are on the telephone regularly, I’m always in the loop. Like the community nurse and the dietician, we all know what we are doing because we’re all on the same page.”
Monitoring and improving outcomes
Staff routinely monitored people’s care and treatment to continuously improve it. They ensured outcomes were positive and consistent, and that they met both clinical expectations and the expectations of people themselves. Care plans were personalised to ensure outcomes could be met, which meant people received safe and effective support. There was evidence of regular reviews and action being taken immediately following any changes to people’s needs. During reviews, care needs were discussed to improve outcomes. A professional commented, “When reviewing, I feel carers are genuinely concerned for the best outcome for my patient’s quality of life rather than regarding them as a generic client.” Regular audits were also carried out to monitor and improve outcomes.
Consent to care and treatment
Staff at the service told people about their rights around consent and respected these when delivering person-centred care and treatment. People’s consent to care and support was respected by staff. Care plans contained evidence that consent to care documents had been obtained from people’s legal representatives.