- GP practice
i-HEART 365 Service - Out of Hours Service
Assessment report published 17 April 2026
Contents
On this page
- Overview
- Person-centred Care
- Care provision, Integration and continuity
- Providing Information
- Listening to and involving people
- Equity in access
- Equity in experiences and outcomes
- Planning for the future
Responsive
People were involved in decisions about their care. The service provided information people could understand. People knew how to give feedback and were confident the service took it seriously and acted on it. The service was easy to access and worked to eliminate discrimination. People received fair and equal care and treatment. The service worked to reduce health and care inequalities through training and feedback.
This service scored 75 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.
Person-centred Care
The service made sure people were at the centre of their care and treatment choices and they decided, in partnership with people, how to respond to any relevant changes in people’s needs.
The provider assured us that care plans reflected patients’ physical, mental, emotional and social needs, including needs related to protected characteristics under the Equality Act. They told us that patients were supported to understand their conditions and were involved in decisions about their care. The provider reported no complaints or incidents relating to this and had carried out their own audits to confirm that their approach was working effectively.
The service maintained timely communication with patients registered GPs. Friends and Family Test feedback indicated that patients felt their consultations were thorough and that they were involved in decisions about their care.
Care provision, Integration and continuity
The service understood the diverse health and care needs of people and their local communities, so care was joined-up, flexible and supported choice and continuity. We saw the provider worked in partnership with local practices and also hosted the primary care network (PCN) to meet the needs of the town’s patient population. For example, through the PCN they had recruited mental health workers through the Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme (ARRS) to provide short‑term specialist assessment and support for practices across Barnsley.
Providing Information
The service supplied appropriate, accurate and up-to-date information in formats that were tailored to individual needs. The service had access to interpreter services, including British Sign Language. Information provided by the service met the Accessible Information Standard.
Listening to and involving people
The service made it easy for people to share feedback and ideas, or raise complaints about their care, treatment and support. They involved people in decisions about their care and told them what had changed as a result.
We saw complaints were managed in line with the practice’s policy. Learning from complaints was evident and staff were able to identify changes made as a result of patient feedback, including complaints. For example, following a delayed referral staff received refresher training on the local physiotherapy referral pathway.
Equity in access
The service ensured that people could access the care, support, and treatment they required at the time they needed it. The provider delivered core GP services to patients in Barnsley during out-of-hours periods—between 6pm and 8am Monday to Friday, and from 6pm on Friday to 8am on Monday. Patients accessed the service by telephoning NHS 111 or through referrals from the Urgent Care Team or Right Care Barnsley.
The service was staffed by regular locum GPs, advanced nurse practitioners, and physician associates, and was supported by care navigators who prioritised incoming cases. Both telephone and face-to-face appointments were available at the main site in Lundwood and the branch site in Wombwell.
Provider data showed an average of 2,800 patient contacts per month, with winter peaks exceeding 3,200 per month. Audit data indicated that fewer than 5% of patients were directed to accident and emergency, and less than 1% were referred back to their own GP following contact with the service.
Treatment rooms were available on the ground floor at both sites with disabled access and facilities available.
Clear staffing rotas were in place, and the provider reported using the same staff across both the out-of-hours and extended hours services they managed to increase workforce availability. The provider had recently increased the number of face-to- face appointments available in the out of hours service. They also had plans to undertake a project to analyse demand and capacity further, allowing them to identify peaks and troughs to continuously monitor and improve the service.
Friends and Family Test feedback indicated that patients were able to obtain appointments when needed and were seen promptly when attending the service.
Equity in experiences and outcomes
Staff and leaders actively listened to information about people who are most likely to experience inequality in experience or outcomes and tailored their care, support and treatment in response to this.
Feedback provided by people using the service, to the provider was largely positive. Staff treated people equally and without discrimination. Staff had received training in equality and diversity. Leaders sought ways to address any barriers to improving people’s experience and worked with local organisations to address any local health inequalities. Staff understood the importance of providing an inclusive approach to care and made adjustments to support equity in people’s experience and outcomes.
Planning for the future
The provider had access to a patient’s medical record and could access records relating to any health plan or important life changes, including end of life decisions.