• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Heston House Resource Centre

201-209 Vicarage Farm Road, Heston, Middlesex, TW5 0AH (020) 8583 4700

Provided and run by:
London Borough of Hounslow

All Inspections

25 October 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with the manager, four other staff, eight people who use the service and two relatives. Some of the people using the service were unable to share their experiences with us as they had complex needs. However, we used a variety of methods to gather information about people's experiences such as looking at care records, speaking with staff and observing care in the home.

People were involved in their care and asked for their views about the care and support they received. We observed positive interactions between staff and the people using the service. People told us that staff respected their privacy and treated them well. One person said, "I like it here, once you get to know the staff you can have a good laugh with them." Another person told us, "it's home from home." A relative we spoke with said, "the staff are really helpful, friendly and caring."

We saw that people's needs had been assessed prior to them being admitted to the home to ensure that staff could meet their needs effectively. We found that care plans had been developed in line with people's assessed needs and included their likes, dislikes and preferences. People had access to a range of healthcare professionals and any identified risks to people's wellbeing were managed to ensure that people were kept safe.

The home was clean, warm and maintained to an adequate standard. Health and safety and fire safety checks were taking place as required. People were able to personalise their bedrooms.

Staff received training to equip them with the skills and knowledge to meet people's needs effectively. They also received support and supervision from their line manager.

The home had effective quality monitoring systems in place.

5 March 2013

During an inspection in response to concerns

We visited the service because we had received information that the service might not be complying with essential standards of quality and safety. In particular concerns were raised about staffing levels during the evening and health and safety issues caused by windows not shutting properly and being held closed with scarves.

The visit took place during the evening and we spoke with a senior member of staff. Following the inspection we also spoke with the assistant resource manager who provided further information.

We found that some of the windows on the ground floor had not been adequately maintained and could not be closed properly to ensure people's safety. Since our visit we have received information from the provider informing us that the windows have now been repaired. This will be confirmed at the next inspection of the service.

We found that staffing levels had been temporarily reduced at night as there had been a reduction in the number of people using the service and there had been some permanent staff absences. However, the provider had taken steps to ensure that there were enough staff on duty to meet people's needs.

2 November 2012

During a routine inspection

We spoke with eight people who used the service, four relatives, the home manager and five other members of staff. People were positive about the care provided and felt that they were included in any decision making. We saw in the records that wherever possible people had given consent to their care plan. Where people were unable to give consent the home had ensured that they had involved people who had knowledge about the person, such as a relative, to ensure informed decisions were made about their care.

People's needs had been assessed and care plans developed to ensure staff knew what action to take to meet them. The care plans had been updated to reflect people's changing needs. People told us that staff were respectful and one person said "staff treat me nicely". A relative spoken with also said "they treat my daughter very well"

The home provided people with a range of activities to take part in such as tea parties, performances by local theatre groups and trips out into the community. Activities that met people's cultural and religious needs were also arranged, such as an Asian women's prayer group held on a monthly basis and people also told us that they were supported to attend church services.

The home had appropriate systems in place to protect people from the risk of infection and staff adhered to these. There was an appropriate complaints system in place and an atmosphere in which people were able to raise any concerns as they felt listened to.

8 September 2011

During a routine inspection

People who use the service told us that staff treat them with respect and are available when they need them. They gave positive feedback about the staff that support them and said they get good care.

People told us that they get support to stay healthy and to get treatment when they need it. They said that they enjoy the activities provided by the home and that there are regular opportunities to go out.

People said that they are asked for their opinions about the care they receive and the way the home is run. They said that if they had ever been unhappy about something, the home had addressed their concerns.

Relatives told us that they are encouraged to be involved in their family member's care. They said that care staff knew their family member's needs well and respected their preferences about their care. Relatives also said that people are given good support to settle in when they first arrive and that the home is good at communicating with them about their family member's care.