• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: The Knowle Limited

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

60-62 Carterknowle Road, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S7 2DX (0114) 258 3201

Provided and run by:
The Knowle Limited

All Inspections

21 February 2017

During a routine inspection

A scheduled inspection took place on 21 February 2017 and was announced. The registered provider was given short notice of our inspection. We did this because this was a small service and the registered manager was sometimes out of the office and we needed to be sure that a senior member of staff would be available. The service was last inspected on 13 October 2015.

The Knowle Limited is registered to provide accommodation for up to 13 people, some of whom may have mental health problems or learning disabilities. The main building was formerly two Victorian villas that have been renovated to form one large house. All bedrooms are single. Communal areas and bathing facilities are provided. At the time of the inspection there were nine people living at the service. One person was in hospital at the time of our inspection.

There was a registered manager for the service in post at the time of the inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are “registered persons”. Registered persons have a legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

At the last inspection we found a breach of Regulation 13 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014, Safeguarding service users from abuse and improper treatment. The provider sent us an action plan telling us about the action they would complete to reach compliance. At this inspection we checked to see if sufficient improvements had been made. We saw some improvements had been made at the service to safeguard people from harm. However, we found one safeguarding concern had not been reported appropriately to the local safeguarding authority. This showed that further improvement was required.

We found a continued breach of Regulation 13 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014, Safeguarding service users from abuse and improper treatment.

We found a few people’s risk assessment and care plans would benefit from containing more information about their early warning signs of a potential relapse and becoming unwell.

We saw the process in place to ensure incidents were reported appropriately to the Care Quality Commission required improvement.

People and staff we spoke with did not express any concerns regarding the staffing levels at the service.

We saw that appropriate pre-employment checks had been carried out to ensure staff were of good character and suitable to work with vulnerable adults.

The service had appropriate arrangements in place to manage medicines so people were protected from the risks associated with medicines.

People we spoke with were satisfied with the quality of care they had received and made positive comments about the staff.

People we spoke with told us they had been fully involved in their care planning and actively involved in any reviews.

In people’s records we found evidence of involvement from other professionals such as doctors and community psychiatric nurses (CPN).

People’s individualised diets were being met. We received positive comments from people we spoke with about the quality of the food.

Staff were supported to deliver care safely and to an appropriate standard.

Staff had undertaken training to give them the skills and knowledge to carry out their roles effectively.

People we spoke with said they were treated with dignity and respect.

People we spoke with were confident that if they raised any concerns or complaints, these would be taken seriously and appropriate action taken.

The service actively sought the views of people living at the service to continuously improve the service.

There were processes in place to monitor the quality and safety of the service. However, we saw some processes required improvement.

We saw the system in place to ensure policies were reviewed so they reflected key legislation and guidance required improvement.

We found one breach of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can see what action we told the registered provider to take at the back of the full version of the report.

13 October 2015

During a routine inspection

A scheduled inspection took place on 13 October 2015. The inspection was unannounced which meant the staff and provider did not know we would be inspecting the service.

The service was last inspected on 13 January 2014. At the last inspection we found the service was meeting requirements.

The Knowle Limited is registered to provide accommodation for persons for up to 13 people, some of whom may have mental health problems or learning disabilities. The main building was formerly two Victorian villas that have been renovated to form one large house. All bedrooms are single. Communal areas and bathing facilities are provided. At the time of the inspection there were 11 people living at the service.

There was a registered manager for the service in post at the time of the inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are “registered persons”. Registered persons have a legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People told us they felt safe and were treated with dignity and respect. People were satisfied with the quality of care they had received and made positive comments about the staff.

Although our discussions with staff told us they would to raise any safeguarding issues, we found some staff would benefit from further training regarding the different types of abuse, their role and responsibilities. We found there was a risk that some people’s behaviour was not managed consistently and the risks to their health, welfare and safety were not managed effectively. It is important that people are protected from abuse.

People spoken with did not express any concerns regarding the staffing levels at the service. People described what they would do if they required support during the day or night.

Recruitment procedures were in place and appropriate checks were undertaken before staff started work. This meant people were cared for by qualified staff who had been assessed as suitable to work with people.

We found that people were protected against the risks associated with the unsafe management of medicines.

People’s individualised diets were being met. We received positive comments about the quality of the food.

We observed staff giving care and assistance to people throughout the inspection. People were respectful and treated people in a caring and supportive way.

The service had policies and procedures in relation to the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005 and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). We found that staff would benefit from further training to improve their knowledge and uphold people’s rights.

The provider had quality assurance processes in place. However, we found the provider did not have effective systems in place to assess, monitor and mitigate the risks relating to the health, safety and welfare of people.

The provider had ensured that an accurate, complete and contemporaneous record in respect of each person was maintained.

We found one breach of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can see the action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of this report.

13 January 2014

During a routine inspection

Before people received any care or treatment they were asked for their consent and the provider acted in accordance with their wishes. One person told us: ' I'm happy living here, I'm satisfied with choice [of food].'

Food and drink met people's individual dietary needs. One person said, 'It's alright the food here.'

People were protected against the risks associated with medicines because the provider had appropriate arrangements in place to manage medicines.

People were cared for by staff who were supported to deliver care and treatment safely and to an appropriate standard.

The provider had an effective system to regularly assess and monitor the quality of service that people received.

11 February 2013

During a routine inspection

People told us they were involved and given choices about their care and described examples such as what they wanted to do and where to sit. We saw that people using the service who were able made choices about where to spend their time. One person told us, 'I like to spend time in the lounge.' Another person said, 'very nice food, choice of puddings.'

People who used the service told us they were happy with the care and support they received at The Knowle. One person said, 'quite a nice place to live.'

The provider had suitable arrangements in place to ensure that people who used the service were safeguarded against the risk of abuse.

The provider had an effective recruitment and selection process in place. We saw evidence that staff that were employed by the home had undertaken relevant checks before they were allowed to commence working.

We found that a complaints policy and procedure was in place. All of the people spoken with said they had no complaints or concerns about the home.