• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Headingley Court

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Headingley Way, Edlington, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, DN12 1SB (01709) 866610

Provided and run by:
Headingley Care Centre (Edlington) Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

7 December 2017

During a routine inspection

This unannounced comprehensive inspection took place on 7 December 2017. The last inspection took place on 13 October 2015. The service was meeting the requirements of the regulations at that time. The service was rated Good. At this inspection the service remained Good.

Headingley Court is a purpose built home providing care and support for up to 25 people with nursing needs. At the time of our inspection, the home was fully occupied. The home provides accommodation on one level. It is situated in the village of Edlington in Doncaster close to local amenities.

People were protected from avoidable abuse and harm by trained staff. Risks were assessed, identified and managed appropriately, with guidance for staff on how to mitigate risks. Premises and equipment were managed safely. Staffing levels were sufficient to meet people's needs. New staff were vetted as to their suitability to work in a care setting before commencing employment. Systems for the management and administration of medicines were safe. It was clear that people had received their medicine as prescribed.

People's rights were protected because staff acted in accordance with the Mental Capacity Act 2005. The principles of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards were understood and applied correctly.

Staff had been trained in a range of areas to enable them to provide effective care to people in line with their support needs. Staff received regular supervision and appraisals of their work and performance. Staff meetings were organised. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible. Menus provided people with a range of food choices and people enjoyed the food on offer at the home. Healthcare professionals were consulted as needed and people had access to a range of healthcare services.

Staff were kind, caring and compassionate with people. People told us their relatives visiting the home were welcomed. People and their relatives were supported to express their views and encouraged to make decisions about their care. People were treated with dignity and respect.

Care plans provided comprehensive information about people, their personal histories and preferences. Staff demonstrated that they had a good knowledge of people's care needs and that they knew people well. Activities were organised by care staff and entertainers visited from outside the home. Complaints were managed in line with the provider's policy.

People and their relatives were involved in developing the service; their views and feedback were obtained and acted upon. Residents' meetings took place and questionnaires were completed by relatives. A registered manager was in post and was freely available to people, relatives and staff. Good quality care was delivered and a system of audits was in place to measure and monitor the service overall. Any actions identified were acted upon.

13 October 2015

During a routine inspection

The inspection took place on 13 October 2015 and was unannounced. The service was registered with the CQC in April 2014 so this was the first inspection of the service under the new registration.

Headingley Court is a purpose built home providing care and support to people with nursing needs. The home provides accommodation on one level. It is situated in the village of Edlington in Doncaster close to local amenities.

The service had a registered manager in post at the time of our inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons.’ Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The provider had a policy in place to protect people from abuse. The policy included types of abuse, and how to recognise and report potential abuse. Staff we spoke with confirmed that they had read the policy and told us they would report anything of this nature immediately.

The provider supported people to take their medicines in a safe and appropriate manner. The provider had a policy in place which detailed how staff should store, record, dispose and administer medicines safely.

The service had a staff recruitment system in place. Pre-employment checks were obtained prior to people commencing employment. However, we saw the recruitment policy required updating as it still referred to Protection of Vulnerable Adults (POVA) and Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) checks which have now been replaced with the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) check .

We observed staff working with people and found there were enough staff to meet people’s needs. Each care plan we saw contained a dependency score of high, medium or low depending on how much care and support the person required. This was used to determine staffing levels.

Support plans we looked at included risk assessments which identified any risks associated with the person’s care and support.

Staff we spoke with told us they received training relevant to carry out their role. They told us their training covered mandatory subjects such as food hygiene, health and safety, first aid, moving and handling and safeguarding.

The care plans we looked at indicated that people had been involved in them and in making decisions about their care and support. For example, people had signed a consent form to have their photos taken for identification, and social activity displays.

Food and drink was provided to people in sufficient quantities to ensure they received a healthy balanced diet. We saw meals were served on a very flexible basis and as and when people wanted to eat.

People were supported to maintain good health, have access to healthcare services and received ongoing healthcare support.

Through our observations it was clear that people had a good relationship with the staff and we were told they saw them as their friends. The atmosphere in the home was very friendly and happy with people chatting and laughing together.

Care plans we looked at contained an assessment of the persons needs and a series of care plans which clearly set out how to assist the person.

The provider had a complaints procedure displayed on the notice board and it was available in an easy read version. We spoke with the registered manager who showed us a log of complaints which detailed actions taken and the outcome.

We spoke with people who used the service and asked them if they felt the home was managed well. They all told us that the manager was always around and her office door was always open. Staff we spoke with said they really enjoyed working at the home and felt involved in the service developments, and were supported by the management team.

We saw audits took place to ensure policies and procedures were being followed.

People who used the service were involved in the development of the home and were able to contribute ideas.