• Dentist
  • Dentist

Archived: Watch Dental Clinic - Benton

2 Manor Road, Benton, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, NE7 7XS (0191) 266 1487

Provided and run by:
Dr. Karl Nightingale

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile
Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

1 March 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a follow up desk-based inspection of Watch Dental Clinic - Benton on 1 March 2022. This inspection was carried out to review in detail the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements.

The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who had access to a specialist dental adviser.

We undertook a comprehensive inspection of Watch Dental Clinic - Benton on 12 October 2021 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found the registered provider was not providing well-led care and was in breach of regulations 17 and 19 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for Watch Dental Clinic - Benton on our website www.cqc.org.uk.

When one or more of the five questions are not met we require the service to make improvements and send us an action plan. We then inspect again after a reasonable interval, focusing on the areas where improvement was required.

As part of this inspection we asked:

• Is it well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 12 October 2022.

Background

The provider has two dental practices and this report is about Watch Dental Clinic - Benton.

Watch Dental Clinic - Benton is in Newcastle Upon Tyne and provides NHS and private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There is level access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces, including dedicated parking for people with disabilities, are available near the practice.

The dental team includes a principal dentist, a practice manager, three associate dentists and four dental nurses, who also carry out reception work. The practice has two treatment rooms and is entirely on ground floor level.

During the inspection we communicated with the practice manager who provided evidence of practice procedures and other records relating to how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Monday to Friday: 9am to 6pm.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should

  • Take action to ensure the practice's fire risk assessment is adequate and fire safety management is effective.

12 October 2021

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out this announced focused inspection on the 12 October 2021 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission, (CQC), inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following three questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Watch Dental Clinic – Benton is in Newcastle Upon Tyne and provides NHS and private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There is level access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces, including dedicated parking for people with disabilities, are available in front of the practice.

The dental team includes a principal dentist, a practice manager, three associate dentists and four dental nurses, who also carry out reception work. The practice has two treatment rooms and is entirely on ground floor level.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

During the inspection we spoke with the practice manager, two dentists and three dental nurses. The principal dentist was not available. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Monday – Friday: 9am to 6pm.

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared to be visibly clean and well-maintained.
  • The provider had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • The provider had implemented standard operating procedures in line with national guidance on COVID-19.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available.
  • The provider could improve their systems to manage risks to patients and staff.
  • The provider had safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.
  • The provider’s staff recruitment procedures did not reflect current legislation.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The appointment system took account of patients’ needs.
  • Leadership and management systems were not effective.
  • Staff felt involved and supported and worked as a team.
  • The provider asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The provider dealt with complaints positively and efficiently.
  • The provider had information governance arrangements.

We identified regulations the provider was not complying with. They must:

  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.
  • Ensure recruitment procedures are established and operated effectively to ensure only fit and proper persons are employed.

Full details of the regulations the provider was not meeting are at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Improve the practice's protocols and procedures for the use of X-ray equipment in compliance with The Ionising Radiations Regulations 2017 and Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2017 and taking into account the guidance for Dental Practitioners on the Safe Use of X-ray Equipment. In particular, ensure the practice registers with the Health and Safety Executive for working with radiation devices.
  • Implement audits for prescribing of antibiotic medicines taking into account the guidance provided by the College of General dentistry.

16 February 2016

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection on 16 February 2016 to ask the practice the following key questions; Are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

The practice is owned by Dr. Karl Nightingale.

The practice offers primary care dentistry under the NHS. There are two surgeries located on the ground floor which are accessible to people with mobility issues.

The practice is open Monday to Friday 9am to 6pm, Saturday (by appointment only) 9am to 1pm.

There are three dentists, three dental nurses (one of whom is the practice manager), and two trainee dental nurses.

The owner is the registered provider for the practice. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the practice is run.

We received feedback from a patient about the service via a Care Quality Commission comment card. The feedback was positive about the service they had received.

Our key findings were:

  • There was an effective complaints system.
  • Staff had received safeguarding training, knew how to recognise signs of abuse and how to report it.
  • There were sufficient numbers of suitably qualified staff to meet the needs of patients.
  • Staff had been trained to manage medical emergencies.
  • Infection control procedures were in accordance with the published guidelines.
  • Patient care and treatment was planned and delivered in line with evidence based guidelines and current regulations.
  • Patients received clear explanations about their proposed treatment, costs, benefits and risks and were involved in making decisions about it.
  • Patients were treated with dignity and respect and confidentiality was maintained.
  • Patients could access routine treatment and urgent care when required.
  • The practice was well-led, staff felt involved and supported and worked well as a team.
  • The governance systems were effective.
  • The practice sought feedback from staff and patients about the services they provided.

There was an area where the provider could make improvements and should:

  • Review availability of equipment to manage medical emergencies giving due regard to guidelines issued by the Resuscitation Council (UK) standards for the dental team.

18 November 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We spoke with four people who used the service to find out their opinions about the treatment and quality of service they received at the dental practice. One person told us, 'It's absolutely lovely there. They look after you, they speak to you nicely and they have nice manners.' Another person said, 'It's a brilliant place and you get good service.'

Everyone we spoke with made positive comments and indicated that they were pleased with the treatment they received. One person said, 'The staff are brilliant, I feel so comfortable with the staff.' Another person commented, 'It's very good. I was with my last dentist for over 30 years and I've been here about a year now. My dentist now is just as good, he's very pleasant and efficient.'

We found that staff received the appropriate support and training for their professional development. One person told us, 'The staff appear very well trained, I feel very much at ease with them.'

There were effective systems in place to regularly assess and monitor the quality of service that people received, which included audits and checks of records and equipment.

We saw that people's personal records, staff records and other records relevant to the management of the practice were kept securely and were accurate and fit for purpose.

4 June 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with four people to find out their opinions about the service they received at the dental practice. One person informed us, 'It's very good. Myself, my wife, son and daughter and all our grandchildren go there, it's very good.'

People told us they were involved in planning their treatment since they were given information and possible options for treatment. We concluded that people who used the service were provided with information about care and treatment available at the practice.

People were complimentary about the treatment they had received. One person informed us, 'I've used it for 30 years, it's excellent. I'm happy with it. The dentists have changed, but the service is still good.' We found that care and treatment was planned and delivered in a way that was intended to ensure people's safety and welfare.

We concluded that people were cared for in a clean, hygienic environment and there were effective systems in place to reduce the risk and spread of infection.

Staff informed us that they were appropriately trained; however we found that suitable appraisal and supervision arrangements were not fully in place.

We concluded that the provider did not have an effective system in place to identify, assess and manage risks to the health, safety and welfare of people who used the service and others.

We found that records relevant to staffing and the management of the service were not always accurate and fit for purpose.