21 and 23 December 2015
During a routine inspection
This inspection took place on 21 and 23 December 2015 and was announced. This was the services first inspection since it was registered with the commission. SENSE- Supported Living Services provides supported living services for four people with hearing and sight impairments and who require support with personal care.
There was a registered manager at the service. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have a legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
People told us that they felt safe. Staff had a good knowledge of current safeguarding practice and how to apply this knowledge to their role of supporting people in the service. Risks to people had been identified and minimised wherever possible. We saw that there were sufficient staff available to meet people’s requests for support. People were able to state when they wanted to receive support from staff who understood the need to work flexibly.
People were supported to make choices and where it was determined that they may lack the capacity to make specific decisions appropriate support was given. Staff were working within the parameters of the Mental Capacity Act (2005).
We saw that medicines were managed safely. Staff had access to information about the specific support people needed with their medicines and there were systems in place to monitor medication administration practice.
People told us they felt cared for. Care was planned with each person and people were able to state what activities or support they wanted. Staff had a good knowledge of the people they were supporting and told us they enjoyed supporting people. People had been involved in the recruiting of staff who had similar interests to them. Care was reviewed with the person to ensure the care provided was still meeting people’s needs.
The service had supported people to be as independent as possible in all aspects of their lives. When necessary specialist equipment was sourced and used to support the person to live independently whilst still remaining safe. People had retained their independence in meal planning and preparation and in participating in activities of their choice.
Staff felt valued and supported in their role and had opportunity to feedback or make suggestions for the running of the service. Staff told us they had sufficient training to carry out their role effectively and we saw that training on key areas of care occurred regularly.
People and their relatives were aware of how to raise concerns or make complaints. We saw that where complaints had been received appropriate action had been taken to resolve the complaint.
People and their relatives were happy with how the service was managed. There were systems in place to monitor the quality of the service which included seeking feedback from the people who used the service. The registered manager had plans of how they wanted to improve the service to make it more effective for the people accessing support and for the staff team.