• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Wisdom Support Services Ltd

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

River House, 1 Maidstone Road, Sidcup, Kent, DA14 5RH 07735 374344

Provided and run by:
Wisdom Support Limited

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Our current view of the service

Requires improvement

Updated 6 February 2026

Assessment activity started on 18 November 2025 and ended on 06 February 2026.

Wisdom Support Services supports people living in supported living’ settings, so that they can live as independently as possible. People’s care and housing are provided under separate contractual agreements. CQC does not regulate premises used for supported living; this assessment looked at people’s personal care and support.

The service provides support for people who have mental health needs, autism and learning or physical disabilities. We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. At the time of the assessment there were 7 people using the service who received personal care in supported living schemes. We visited 2 people in their homes.

The assessment was carried out because of the length of time since our last assessment in 2018. The last rating for this service was ‘Good’.

We assessed all the quality statements from the safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led key questions.

This was an announced assessment and comprehensive assessment, the overall rating for the service is Requires Improvement. Th provider was in breach of legal regulation in relation to fit and proper persons employed, safeguarding, and good governance.

Risk assessments and management plans were not always robust. Medicines were not always safely managed. People were not always safeguarded from potential abuse. People were not always protected from the risk of infection. Robust recruitment checks were not always carried out. Staff did not always feel supported by senior managers. Management governance, oversight and the provider’s quality assurance processes were not always effective. This was because they had failed to identify the concerns we found at this assessment. The provider responded positively to the findings.

People’s needs were assessed prior to joining the service. People's privacy and dignity were maintained. Staff received regular supervision. Staff were kind and caring and promoted people’s independence. The service was working within the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). People were provided with information in formats that met their needs.

There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the CQC to manage the service. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service operates.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

People's experience of the service

Updated 6 February 2026

People using the service at the time of our assessment could use words to communicate. Therefore, we observed how staff supported people. We spoke with their relatives to gather feedback about their experiences. We found people were able to spend time the way they wanted. People could choose how to spend their recreational time and were able to go out in the community when they chose to. Staff treated people well and were attentive to their needs. People were supported to access healthcare professionals when needed. We found people had experienced some positive outcomes with their care and treatment. Relatives told us they felt people were safe and looked after.

Relatives spoke positively about the service.