• Doctor
  • Independent doctor

90 Sloane Street Limited

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

90 Sloane Street, London, SW1X 9PQ (020) 7235 5850

Provided and run by:
90 Sloane Street Limited

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

Assessment report published 7 July 2026

On this page

Well-led

Good

9 June 2026

We looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture

At our last inspection in July 2018, we rated this key question as Good. At this assessment in March 2026, the rating remains the same.

This service scored 71 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.

Shared direction and culture

Score: 3

The service had a shared vision, strategy and culture. This was based on transparency, equity, equality and human rights, diversity and inclusion, engagement, and understanding challenges and the needs of people and their communities.

All staff had contributed to the development of the service vision and strategy, which was kept under review.

Capable, compassionate and inclusive leaders

Score: 3

The service had inclusive leaders at all levels who understood the context in which they delivered care, treatment and support and embodied the culture and values of their workforce and organisation. Leaders had the skills, knowledge, experience and credibility to lead effectively. They did so with integrity, openness and honesty.

Staff told us leaders in the practice was approachable and responded to any concerns raised. Staff also told us leaders modelled the values of the practice.

Freedom to speak up

Score: 3

The service fostered a positive culture where people felt they could speak up and their voice would be heard.

The service had established Freedom to Speak up arrangements. Patients we spoke with were aware of how to raise concerns if they were not satisfied with the service.

Workforce equality, diversity and inclusion

Score: 3

The service valued diversity in their workforce. They work towards an inclusive and fair culture by improving equality and equity for people who work for them.

Policies and procedures to promote diversity and equality were in place.

Adjustments had been made to ensure all staff were valued and supported. For example, flexible working arrangements were accommodated where possible to meet individual personal or family needs.

Governance, management and sustainability

Score: 2

The practice had clear responsibilities and roles. However, we found there was a lack of effective governance in some areas, including some gaps in recruitment checks, management of legionella, limited oversight of pathology results management, a lack of patient coding within the clinical system, and logs of safety alerts were not consistently maintained.

Leaders and managers supported staff, and all staff we spoke with were clear on their individual roles and responsibilities. Managers met with staff regularly to complete appraisals and performance reviews. The provider had established governance processes that were appropriate for their service, although some were ineffective and improvements were required. Staff could access all required policies and procedures. Managers held regular practice meetings with staff, during which they discussed clinical concerns and emerging risks. Managers clearly recorded any actions arising from these meetings and ensured they shared these with staff. Staff took patient confidentiality and information security seriously.

Partnerships and communities

Score: 3

Feedback from people using the service was positive.

The service understood their duty to collaborate and work in partnership, so services worked seamlessly for people. They shared information and learning with partners and collaborated for improvement.

Learning, improvement and innovation

Score: 3

The service focused on continuous learning, innovation and improvement across the organisation and local system. They encouraged creative ways of delivering equality of experience, outcome and quality of life for people. They actively contribute to safe, effective practice and research. All staff were encouraged to put forward and test out new ways of working.

The service provided appointments with GPs and a range of consultants. It offered genome screening through two main genetic testing pathways: preventive screening and whole genome screening, both aimed at saving lives by identifying individual genetic risk and significantly reducing that risk through early intervention.

The service enhanced patient care through rapid access to in-house laboratory testing, cardiac diagnostics and specialist cardiology advice, supporting timely diagnosis and treatment decisions.