• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Homelium West Sussex

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

59 High Street, East Grinstead, RH19 3DD (01342) 645461

Provided and run by:
Homelium Care Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Our current view of the service

Requires improvement

Updated 16 May 2026

Date of assessment: 4 June 2026. Homelium West Sussex is a homecare agency providing personal care to people in their own homes. This was the first assessment of the service. At the time of our assessment, 53 people were receiving the regulated activity of personal care. People and relatives generally felt safe and described staff as kind, caring and respectful. One relative said, "The staff are lovely and they keep [person] safe and look after them very well.” People valued receiving support from staff who knew them well and understood their preferences and routines. Several people and relatives told us staff promoted people's independence, respected their choices and often went above and beyond to provide support. Assessments were completed before care started, and people and those important to them were involved in planning their care and support. Staff promoted people’s dignity and worked with professionals when people’s needs changed. However, some people experienced late or rushed visits, did not always receive support from familiar staff and staff were not always given sufficient travel time between visits. Care plans, risk assessments and medicines records were not always accurate, complete, person-specific or up to date. Safeguarding concerns, accidents and incidents were not consistently recorded, monitored or analysed to identify learning, mitigate risks and drive improvement. Governance and quality assurance systems were not effective and had not identified or addressed all the shortfalls found during the assessment. This included insufficient oversight of care planning, risk management, medicines records, safeguarding processes and compliance with the provider’s conditions of registration. The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to good governance. There was no registered manager in post at the time of the assessment, although an application was in progress. Following our feedback, the provider responded proactively and submitted a detailed action plan setting out the action taken and planned to address the concerns identified. The provider had already begun implementing improvements, including enhanced oversight, auditing and monitoring arrangements. However, these changes were at an early stage and the provider had not yet demonstrated that they were fully implemented, effective or embedded within the service.

People's experience of the service

Updated 16 May 2026

People and relatives gave mixed but generally positive feedback about the care and support they received. Most told us they felt safe with staff and had developed trusting relationships over time. One relative told us, “We have known the carers for 5 years, they are like part of the family now.” People described staff as kind, caring and respectful and said they generally felt comfortable receiving support in their own homes. One person told us staff were “very helpful and will always do more for me if they had the time.” Another relative said the service had exceeded their expectations and provided the family with “a general feeling of relief.”People valued receiving support from staff who knew them well and understood their preferences and routines. Many people and relatives spoke positively about communication with the office and described managers as approachable, helpful and flexible when changes to visit times were needed. One person told us, “It is not always easy to get through to [care manager] as sometimes I know they may be out on a visit.” Some relatives told us the service worked around healthcare appointments and responded positively when concerns were raised.Experiences of reliability and continuity of care varied. Some people told us they usually received support from familiar staff and that visits were generally on time. However, others said they experienced late visits, did not always receive advance notice of delays and were sometimes supported by staff they did not know. One person told us, “I do feel safe but don’t like having new carers. Which does happen quite often, but I know they are short staffed.” A relative told us, “We are generally happy and so is my [relative], carers can be pushed for time, not always prompt but family manage if they do not turn up on time.” One family had decided to end the service due to concerns about visit times and inconsistent staffing.