• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

London and South East Domiciliary Care Branch (Learning Disability)

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Unit 9 Bourne Court, Unity Trading Estate, Southend Road, Woodford Green, IG8 8HD (020) 8502 3933

Provided and run by:
Ambient Support Limited

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about London and South East Domiciliary Care Branch (Learning Disability) on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about London and South East Domiciliary Care Branch (Learning Disability), you can give feedback on this service.

28 June 2019

During a routine inspection

About the service

London & South East Domiciliary Care is part of Heritage Care. The service provides personal care to people living in their own home on a 24-hour basis.

At the time of inspection, the service provided care for people living in shared accommodation in Brighton & Hove and three London Boroughs. People lived in local authority and private housing, with some being purpose-built and divided into flats. Each flat or house provided living accommodation for one person to five people. At the time of inspection, the service was caring for 37 people.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

The service supported people with a learning disability, autism and complex health needs. The outcomes for people using the service reflected the principles and values of Registering the Right Support by promoting choice and control, independence and inclusion. People's support focused on them having as many opportunities as possible for them to gain new skills and become more independent.

Relatives of the people using the service were happy with the care being received. One relative told us, “I can’t fault them, they [relative] are happy, the staff know their [relative's] ways.” Another said, “In three years, [relative] has come on leaps and bounds, they are more independent because of the input by the care staff.”

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Care plans were holistic and written in large print with pictures in an easy read format, enabling the person to contribute to their plan of care.

The service followed safe staff recruitment processes. Staff were appropriately trained to meet the needs of the people using the service including safe handling of medicines. Systems were in place to monitor safe delivery of care through audits, observational supervision and senior management oversight.

The service worked in collaboration with health and social care professionals and across several local authorities to provide joined-up care. A complaints process was in place and people knew who to go to if they were unhappy with the service.

People were encouraged to be involved in activities within the local communities and these were person-centred. Some people attended local colleges, undertook voluntary jobs, attended places of worship, as well as a variety of local activities. Music and dance were appreciated by many of the people using the service and some people had performed with professional theatre and ballet companies.

People were supported to shop for groceries and healthy eating was encouraged. At some of the houses, meal times provided an opportunity to meet up and prepare, cook and eat together. The varied abilities of the people using the service were understood by staff, and people were assisted to reach their full potential. We observed the promotion of equality and diversity and staff treating people in a respectful and dignified manner.

Information about some people's end of life wishes had been recorded. However, staff may not be able to support someone at the end of their life as training had not been provided.

We have made recommendations that the provider sources end of life training for staff.

The service was well led by an experienced management team. Quality assurance practices were in place to monitor the service to ensure it delivered high quality care to people.

Rating at last inspection: The last rating for this service was Good (published 22 December 2016).

Why we inspected

This was a planned inspection based on the previous rating.

Follow up: we will continue to monitor intelligence we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If any concerning information is received, we may inspect sooner.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

10 November 2016

During a routine inspection

London & South East Domiciliary Care is part of Heritage Care. The service provides personal care to people living in their own home on a 24 hour basis. The service was supporting 51 people with personal care at the time of our inspection

Two registered managers were in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Staff knew how to identify potential abuse and report concerns. Potential risks to people’s health and well-being were identified, reviewed and managed effectively to support people safely. Staff recruitment processes were thorough to ensure staff employed at the service were suitable and able to work with vulnerable people. People were supported by consistent staff who knew them well and were available in sufficient numbers to meet people's individual needs effectively. People were supported to take their medicines safely.

People’s dignity and privacy was respected and staff were friendly and caring. People were supported to participate in social activities including community based events that suited them. People had support to access healthcare professionals and services. People had choices of food and drinks that supported their nutritional or health care needs and their personal preferences and beliefs.

People received their care from a well supported staff team that had a clear understanding of people's care needs and the skills and knowledge to meet them. The registered manager and staff understood the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and demonstrated how to apply the principles of this legislation to their everyday practice and maintain people’s rights. Staff obtained people’s consent before providing support and respected people’s right to make their own decisions.

Care records were regularly reviewed and showed that the person had been involved in the planning of their care. They included people’s preferences and individual needs so that staff had comprehensive information on how to give people the support that they needed and wished for. People’s care was person centred and well supported Complaints were responded to promptly and effectively.

The service was well led; people knew the registered managers and found them to be approachable and available in the home. People living and working in the service had the opportunity to say how they felt about the home and the service it provided. Their views were listened to and actions were taken in response. The provider and registered manager had systems in place to check on the quality and safety of the service provided and to put actions plans in place where needed.