• Dentist
  • Dentist

Archived: P Sargent Dental Surgery

34 Sandford Road, Bromley, Kent, BR2 9AW (020) 8464 0379

Provided and run by:
Miss Penelope Sargent

All Inspections

21 April 2016

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection on 21 April 2016 to ask the practice the following key questions; Are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

P Sargent Dental Surgery is a dental practice located in the London Borough of Bromley. The premises are situated in a purpose-built single-storey building, adjacent to a residential building. There is one treatment room with a decontamination area, a reception room and a patient toilet on the ground floor.

The practice provides NHS and private services to adults and children. The practice offers a range of dental services including routine examinations and treatment, veneers, extractions, and crowns and bridges.

The staff structure of the practice consists of a principal dentist, three dental nurses and a receptionist.

The practice opening hours are from 9.00am to 1.00pm on Monday, from 9.00am to 8.00pm on Tuesday, from 9.00am to 5.30pm on Wednesday and Thursday and from 8.30am to 12:30pm on Saturday.

The principal dentist is registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) as an individual. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the practice is run.

The inspection took place over one day and was carried out by a CQC inspector and a dental specialist advisor.

Twenty-two people provided feedback about the service. Patients were positive about the care they received from the practice. They were complimentary about the friendly and caring attitude of the dental staff.

Our key findings were:

  • Patients’ needs were assessed and care was planned in line with current guidance such as from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE).
  • There were effective systems in place to reduce and minimise the risk and spread of infection.

  • The practice had effective safeguarding processes in place and staff understood their responsibilities for safeguarding adults and children living in vulnerable circumstances.

  • Staff knew how to report incidents and forms were available to keep a record of any incident which could be used by the practice for shared learning.
  • Equipment, such as the air compressor, autoclave (steriliser), fire extinguishers, and X-ray equipment had all been checked for effectiveness and had been regularly serviced.
  • Patients indicated that they felt they were listened to and that they received good care from a helpful and caring practice team.

  • The practice ensured staff maintained the necessary skills and competence to support the needs of patients.
  • The practice had implemented clear procedures for managing comments, concerns or complaints.

  • The provider had a clear vision for the practice and staff told us they were well supported by the management team.

  • Governance arrangements and audits were effective in improving the quality and safety of the services.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements and should:

  • Review availability of equipment to manage medical emergencies giving due regard to guidelines issued by the Resuscitation Council (UK), and the General Dental Council (GDC) standards for the dental team.
  • Review the storage of dental care products and medicines requiring refrigeration to ensure they are stored in line with the manufacturer’s guidance and the fridge temperature is monitored and recorded.
  • Review recruitment procedures to ensure accurate, complete and detailed records are maintained for all staff.
  • Review the practice’s infection control procedures and protocols giving due regard to guidelines issued by the Department of Health - Health Technical Memorandum 01-05: Decontamination in primary care dental practices and The Health and Social Care Act 2008: ‘Code of Practice about the prevention and control of infections and related guidance’.

31 July 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke to some people who used the service once they had received treatment and reviewed a patient satisfaction survey the provider had carried out in June 2013. People we spoke with were complimentary of the service. They told us they received adequate information and were provided with options about their treatment. People also told us they were clear about their treatment plan and knew about any fees involved. People said staff were always friendly and polite and they put nervous patients at ease. The patient satisfaction survey results showed that all 29 patients surveyed were satisfied or very satisfied with aspects of the surgery including the information they received, treatments and cleanliness. Positive comments were also received regarding the friendliness of staff and the standard of care.

We found that people were provided with sufficient information to allow them to make an informed decision about their treatment. People were also provided with options, and they received treatment in a way that promoted their privacy and dignity. We found people received treatment after an examination of their needs, and their medical history was checked to keep them safe. The dentist had procedures and equipment in place to deal with emergencies. Infection control practice reduced the risk of the spread of infection. Staff were adequately supported through training, and professional development, and we found the provider kept appropriate records which were securely stored.