• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Burwell

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

16 and 18 Hawthorn Way, Burwell, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB25 0DQ (01638) 743764

Provided and run by:
Metropolitan Housing Trust Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile
Important: The provider of this service changed - see old profile

All Inspections

13 September 2016

During a routine inspection

Burwell is registered to provide accommodation and personal care to up to eight people. The people living at the home have learning disabilities and may also have physical disabilities. The home is arranged in two bungalows and situated in a residential part of a Cambridgeshire village. At the time of this inspection care was provided to seven people.

This comprehensive inspection took place on 13 September 2016 and was announced.

The provider is required to have a registered manager as one of their conditions of registration. A registered manager was not in post at the time of the inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to manage the agency. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. A manager had been in post since mid-July 2016 and was applying to be the registered manager.

People were kept safe and staff were knowledgeable about reporting any incident of harm. People were looked after by enough staff to support them with their individual needs. Pre-employment checks were completed on staff before they were assessed to be suitable to look after people who used the service. People were supported to take their medicines as prescribed and were enabled to be independent with this if they were safe to do so

People were supported to eat and drink sufficient amounts of food and drink. They were also supported to access health care services and their individual health and nutritional needs were met.

The CQC is required by law to monitor the Mental Capacity Act 2005 [MCA 2005] and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards [DoLS] and to report on what we find. The provider was aware of what they were required to do should any person lack mental capacity. People’s mental capacity was assessed and care was provided in their best interests. Staff were trained and knowledgeable about the application of the MCA.

People were looked after by staff who were trained and to do their job. However, staff morale was low and the manager was aware of this. They were taking action to remedy this situation. Staff were now receiving one-to-one and group supervision.

People were treated by kind, respectful staff who they liked and they were enabled to make choices about how they wanted to live. People and their relatives were given opportunities to be involved in the review of their individual care plans.

People were supported to be part of the community; they were helped to take part in recreational and work-related activities that were important to them. Care was provided based on people’s individual needs. There was a process in place so that people’s concerns and complaints were listened to and these were acted upon.

The manager was supported by a team of management staff and care staff. There was a high usage of agency staff and there had been four different managers in the last 12 months. The staff considered that these two factors had a negative impact on their morale and effective team work. The manager had identified these issues and was taking remedial action to resolve these concerns.

Staff, people and their relatives were able to make suggestions and actions were taken as a result. Quality monitoring procedures were in place and action was taken where improvements were identified.

10 November 2015

During a routine inspection

Burwell is registered to provided accommodation and personal care for up to eight people. The Cambridgeshire village home is arranged in two bungalows, numbers 16 and 18. At the time of our inspection there were eight people with a learning disability living at the home.

This comprehensive inspection took place on 10 November 2015 and was announced. This is the first inspection of this service since Metropolitan Housing Trust Limited became the registered provider.

A registered manager was not in post at the time of the inspection. The last registered manager applied to voluntarily cancel their registration and we approved their application so that from 9 April 2015 they were no longer the registered manager for the home. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. The current manager’s application to be registered was in progress.

People were provided with support and care by a sufficient number of staff. Whilst recruitment of permanent staff was taking place there were measures to fill the staff vacancies. This included the use of agency and bank staff.

Staff were trained and knowledgeable in keeping people safe from the risk of harm.

Recruitment procedures ensured that people were looked after by suitable staff.

People were supported to be kept safe and were supported to be allowed to take risks in their everyday activities.

People were supported to take their medicines as prescribed by staff that were trained and assessed to be competent to do so.

Staff morale was improving due to an increased level of managerial support and increased number of opportunities to attend training.

The CQC is required by law to monitor the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA 2005) and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) and to report on what we find.. The provider was not acting in accordance with the requirements of the MCA including the DoLS.The provider could not demonstrate how they supported people to make decisions about their care and where they were unable to do so, there were no records showing that decisions were being taken in their best interests. This also meant that people were potentially being deprived of their liberty without the protection of the law.

People were often, but not always, treated by kind, respectful and attentive staff. People were involved in the review of their individual care plans.

Support and care was provided based on people’s individual needs and they were supported to maintain contact with their relatives and the local community. People’s relatives were not actively involved in the care planning process and were not always kept informed. People took part in a range of hobbies and interests. There was a process in place so that people’s concerns and complaints were listened to and these were acted upon.

The manager had experience in care and management and they were supported by their manager. Staff morale and leadership of the home had improved since the change of management of the home. Staff and people were able to make suggestions and actions were taken as a result. Quality monitoring procedures were in place and action was taken where improvements were identified.

We found a breach of Regulation 11 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of the report.