• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: 128 Suez Road

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

128 Suez Road, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB1 3QD (01223) 572158

Provided and run by:
Metropolitan Housing Trust Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile
Important: The provider of this service changed - see old profile

All Inspections

21 October 2016

During a routine inspection

128 Suez Road is registered to provide accommodation and personal care for up to eight people. There were six people living at the home when we visited.

At our last comprehensive inspection on 25 November 2015 we found two breaches of the regulations. These concerned the inadequate assessment of and action to reduce identified risks for people and the lack of arrangements regarding the assessment of people’s mental capacity and deprivation of liberty. The provider wrote and told us what they would do to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breaches.

We undertook this unannounced comprehensive inspection on 21 October 2016 and found the provider had followed their plan and had made improvements.

At the time of our inspection a registered manager was in place. A registered manager is a person who has registered with CQC to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. However, the registered manager was not available on the day of our inspection but we were assisted by the team leader and care staff.

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) is required by law to monitor the operation of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) and report on what we find. We found that people’s rights were being protected as DoLS applications were in progress where required and had been submitted to the relevant local authorities.

People who lived in the home were assisted by staff in a way that supported their safety and that they were treated respectfully. There were healthcare and support plans in place to ensure that staff had guidance to meet people’s individual care needs. The care and support plans recorded people’s individual choices, their likes and dislikes and the assistance they required. Risks to people who lived in the home were identified and assessed to enable people to live as safely and independently as possible.

Staff cared for people in a kind, cheerful and sensitive way. Staff assisted people with personal care, activities/hobbies, cooking meals and domestic tasks throughout our visit to the home. Arrangements were in place to safely assist people with their medicines and nutritional needs. People were supported to have access to external health and social care professionals.

Members of staff were trained to provide care which met people’s individual needs and wishes. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. They were supported by the registered manager and team leader to maintain and develop their skills and knowledge through regular supervision and ongoing training.

People were able to raise any suggestions or concerns they might have with the team leader and staff and people’s way of communicating was understood by staff providing support. We observed that people were listened to and staff responded to them in an understanding and attentive way

The team leader and members of staff communicated well to ensure that people’s needs, activities and appointments for people were responded to in a timely manner. Arrangements were in place to ensure that the quality of the service provided for people were regularly monitored by the registered manager, team leader and staff.

People who lived in the home were encouraged to share their views and arrangements were in place so that people could have their say about the care and services provided.

25 November 2015 & 26 November 2015

During a routine inspection

128 Suez Road is registered to provide accommodation and personal care for up to eight people. There were five people living at the home when we visited. Accommodation is provided over two floors. All bedrooms are for single occupancy and there are separate toilets and bathroom/shower facilities. There is a kitchen, communal areas, including a dining room and a lounge, for people and their guests to use. People and their relatives also had access to the rear garden area.

This unannounced inspection was carried out on 25 November 2015 and 26 November 2015. At the time of our inspection a registered manager was in place. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. However, the registered manager had left their post in July 2015 and their application to voluntarily cancel their registration was in process. A manager had been appointed and they were in the process of applying to be registered with the Care Quality Commission.

The CQC is required by law to monitor the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA 2005) and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) and to report on what we find. The provider was not acting in accordance with the requirements of the MCA including the DoLS. The provider could not demonstrate how they supported people to make decisions about their care and where they were unable to do so, there were no records showing that decisions were being taken in their best interests. This also meant that people were potentially being deprived of their liberty without the protection of the law.

We saw that there were sufficient numbers of staff to assist people’s with their care and support needs. There were care and support plans and risk assessments in place to provide staff with guidance to meet people’s individual care needs. However, they were not up to date. This meant that people were at a risk of not being protected from inappropriate or unsafe care

Staff assisted people with personal care, their medicines, activities/hobbies, cooking and domestic tasks in a kind and cheerful and sensitive way.

Members of staff were trained to provide care which met people’s individual needs and wishes. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. They were supported by the manager to maintain and develop their skills and knowledge through supervision, and ongoing training.

People and their relatives felt able to raise any suggestions or concerns they might have with the manager. People felt listened to and reported that communication with the manager and members of staff were open and very good.

The manager had arrangements in place to monitor the day to day management of the home and the services being provided. People who lived in the home and their relatives were encouraged to share their views about the quality of the care and support provided. However, the provider did not have an effective quality assurance system in place.to monitor the quality of the services provided for people.

We found two breaches of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of the report.