• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: The London Borough of Sutton Shared Lives Team

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

Civic Offices, St Nicholas Way, Sutton, Surrey, SM1 1EA (020) 8770 4129

Provided and run by:
London Borough of Sutton

All Inspections

20 March 2017

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 20 and 23 March 2017. At the last inspection in February 2015 the provider was rated as “good” overall. The London Borough of Sutton Shared Lives Team provides a service where people are placed within a family home and where their personal care and support is given by shared lives carers recruited to the service. In this report the shared lives carers are known as carers and the staff who support the shared lives carers are known as shared lives staff. On the day of our inspection forty two people were provided with care from thirty two carers. The service has two full time equivalent staff posts and one third of a full-time equivalent management post for this service.

At the time of the inspection, there was a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Risks to people's health and safety had been assessed but had not been reviewed to ensure all risks had been identified so they could be appropriately managed. There as therefore a risk that people might be receiving safe care and support.

Care plans had also not been reviewed and updated after people’s care were reviewed by care managers to ensure these were up to date and reflected people’s changing needs. These did not also identify clearly the objectives and goals that people wanted to achieve so there were a clear care plan in place about how these objectives and goals were to be met.

The service did not seem to have enough management support as the registered manager could only dedicate part of their time at the service as they also managed two other services and there were only two office staff to help the running of the service. In addition the quality assurance systems at the service were not very effective as they had not identified the concerns we found so the necessary improvements could be made.

People felt safe using the service and were supported by staff who knew how to keep them safe. Appropriate staff recruitment procedures helped to keep people safe by ensuring only the right carers and staff were recruited to work at the service. People received the support they needed to safely manage their medicines.

Carers and staff had the knowledge and skills to care for people effectively and felt well supported by appropriate training and effective supervision.

People were all able to make choices and decisions about their care sometimes with the support of their carers and relatives.

People received support where they needed it to shop and prepare meals and to access appropriate healthcare services.

People told us they found their carers were caring, helpful and friendly towards them. They said they were treated with dignity and carers respected their privacy and wishes.

Carers were able to describe people's likes and dislikes. People told us carers understood them well. People’s cultural needs were met and carers supported people in fulfilling their individual wishes.

People told us they were involved in planning and making decisions about their care. They said carers listened to them.

People were taking part in activities that they enjoyed. For example, people had been supported to go to college and to go on holiday.

People knew how to complain and there was a complaints procedure available to them.

During the inspection we found three breaches of regulations. These were in relation to safe care and treatment, person centred care and good governance. You can see what action we have asked the provider to take at the back of this report.

16 March 2015

During a routine inspection

This was an announced inspection and took place on 16 March 2015.

At our previous visit in December 2013 we judged the service was meeting all the regulations we looked at.

Sutton Shared Lives Scheme (SSLS) is a shared lives arrangement scheme which recruits and supports paid carers to provide family based placements for adults with learning disabilities within the carer’s home. Arrangements can be long-term with the adult living with the carer as part of their family, or as respite care which can range from a few hours a week, overnight or for longer stays.

At the time of this inspection thirty one people received a service from the SSLS.

The service had a registered manager in post. A ‘registered manager’ is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. In this report we refer to the SSLS staff and to carers; by staff we mean the staff who run the scheme and carers are those people who provide care to people in their homes and are in the scheme.

People told us they felt safe with the care and support they received in their carer’s homes. There were arrangements in place to help safeguard people from the risk of abuse. The provider had appropriate policies and procedures in place to inform people who used the service, their relatives, carers and staff how to report potential or suspected abuse.

People had risk assessments and risk management plans to reduce the likelihood of harm. Carers and staff knew how to use the information to keep people safe.

The registered manager ensured there were safe recruitment procedures to help protect people from the risks of being cared for by carers or staff assessed to be unfit or unsuitable.

Staff and carers received training in areas of their work identified as essential by the provider. We saw documented evidence of this.

Appropriate arrangements were in place in relation to administering and the recording of medicines which helped to ensure they were given to people safely.

Staff and carers had a good understanding of their responsibilities in relation to the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Carers supported people to make choices and decisions about their care wherever they had the capacity to do so.

People had a varied nutritious diet and a choice of meals. They were supported to have a balanced diet, food they enjoyed and were enabled to eat and drink well and stay healthy.

Carers and staff supported people to keep healthy and well through regular monitoring of their general health and wellbeing.

People were involved in planning their care and their views were sought when decisions needed to be made about how they were cared for. The service involved them in discussions about any changes that needed to be made to keep them safe and promote their wellbeing.

Carers and staff respected people’s privacy and treated them with respect and dignity.

People said they felt the service responded to their needs and individual preferences. Carers and staff supported people according to their personalised care plans, including supporting them to access community-based activities.

The provider encouraged people to raise any concerns they had and responded to them in a timely manner. People were aware of the complaints policy that was provided in an easy read format.

People gave positive feedback about the management of the service. The registered manager and the staff were approachable and fully engaged with providing good quality care for people who used the service. The provider had systems in place to continually monitor the quality of the service and people were asked for their opinions via surveys. Action plans were developed where required to address areas for improvements.

The registered manager attended regular shared lives network meetings and conferences to identify examples of good practice to ensure the service was providing a good quality of support.