• Care Home
  • Care home

Herewards House

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

15 Ray Park Avenue, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 8DP (01628) 629038

Provided and run by:
Herewards House Ltd

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of assessment: 23 and 25 February 2026. The service is a care home without nursing providing care and support to older people, younger adults, and people living with dementia. At the time of assessment, 25 people were using the service. The service had not been assessed and rated under the current methodology, so we completed a comprehensive assessment.

At our last inspection, the service was rated requires improvement and was in breach of 1 legal regulation in relation to management of medicine. At this assessment, we found a continued breach of legal regulation in relation to medicine management. We found new breaches of legal regulations relating to fit and proper persons employed, notifications and good governance. We discussed the issues and discrepancies we identified with the management team and they started making improvements.

The provider did not always ensure they used robust assurance systems and governance processes which operated across all levels of the service. Staff had not received all their training to ensure they had the most current knowledge and skills. The provider did not always ensure staff kept clear and complete records of people’s care and treatment plans and risk mitigation. The provider needed to make some improvements to ensure the environment was developed to meet the needs of people living with dementia. Some areas of premises safety needed improvement. We found there were improvements needed to ensure issues were identified and mitigated using provider's quality assurance system. The areas included risk monitoring records for people, aspects of environment safety and suitability. This meant people were at risk of harm and not receiving care they needed. The provider did not always ensure safe and proper management of medicines and recruitment. We found the provider did not inform us and the local authority about some of the notifiable incidents in a timely manner. The provider did not demonstrate they maintained consistent records to meet requirements of duty of candour. The provider had to ensure the service was consistently well-managed and improvements were sustained and embedded. We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

We found the management led an inclusive, caring and compassionate culture of the service with clear dedication and were well respected by people, relatives and staff. The management ensured sufficient staff were available to meet people's needs, covering shifts to ensure consistency in care was provided. Staff felt well supported and believed everyone worked to provide a good service for people. People had some activities and opportunities to pursue their interests in their local area with others. People’s relatives were involved in reviewing and planning their care. People’s views and decisions were listened to and considered. The provider and the staff team worked together to ensure the risks of a closed culture were minimised so that people received support based on transparency, respect and a positive culture in the service. Staff were supported to be involved in the development and continuous improvement of the service. The management team was visible within the service and worked together with staff leading by example. Staff were aware how they protected people from abuse and how they would report incidents, accidents and other concerns. Staff felt confident the issues would be addressed appropriately by the registered manager and the provider. Staff ensured people were protected from the risk of acquiring an infection during the provision of their care. Staff supported people to access different services and support from health and social care professionals to promote and achieve positive outcomes for people. Staff understood the principles of good care and treatment. People’s rights around privacy and dignity were considered and respected.

 

10 March 2020

During a routine inspection

About the service

Herewards House is a residential care home and was providing personal and nursing care for 24 people aged 65 and over at the time of the inspection. The service can support up to 27 people.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

Medicines were not managed and administered in line with good practice guidance. We observed medicine administration during our inspection and saw secondary dispensing took place. In addition, one person did not receive their medicines in line with the prescriber’s instructions. Self-administration of insulin did not follow safe practice and guidance.

Staff we spoke with confirmed they had received training in safeguarding and knew what action to take if they felt people were being abused. Recruitment files we viewed contained the relevant information to ensure staff were recruited safely.

Risks associated with people’s care and support needs had been identified and actions taken to minimise risks.

People we spoke with told us staff were kind and caring. They told us “Staff are kind and look after me well”, “I am very very lucky to be here.” We observed staff interacting with people in a positive way.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People were supported to take part in activities. Activities were reliant on care staff and the service did not employ a specified member of staff for this.

There was a complaints procedure in place. People told us they knew how to make a complaint.

Some auditing took place, accidents and incidents were recorded and responded to effectively.

Staff and people told us the service was well run and they could always seek advice and support from the registered manager.

We have made a recommendation in relation to the providers auditing systems and reviewing consent agreements in relation to capacity.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The previous rating for this service was good (published 30 August 2017).

Why we inspected

This was a planned inspection based on the previous rating.

Enforcement:

We have identified a breach in relation to safe care and treatment at this inspection.

Please see the action we have told the provider to take at the end of this report.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.

27 July 2017

During a routine inspection

Our inspection took place on 27 July 2017 and unannounced.

Herewards House provides accommodation for older adults and people, some of whom have dementia. The service provides ongoing care as well as respite stays. The service is located in a residential area of Maidenhead in Berkshire. The service is registered to accommodate a maximum of 27 people. On the day of our inspection there were 22 people who used the service.

The service must have a registered manager.

At the time of the inspection, there was a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

This was our first inspection of this service since the provider changed their registration, although the service has been operated for many years by the same people.

People were protected from abuse and neglect. We found staff knew about risks to people and how to avoid potential harm. Risks related to people’s care were assessed, recorded and mitigated. The management of risks from the building required some improvement. We found sufficient staff were deployed to meet people’s needs. Medicines management was safe, but improvements were needed in the premises to facilitate better preparation of medicines. We saw some refurbishment had been completed to modernise the building. We made recommendations about window restrictors and Legionella prevention.

Staff training and support was appropriate. Staff had the necessary knowledge, experience and skills to provide good care for people. The service was compliant with the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and associated codes of practice. People’s nutrition and hydration was satisfactory. Appropriate access to community healthcare professionals was available.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible. The policies and systems in the service supported this practice. We made a recommendation about DoLS applications.

There was a lot of complimentary feedback about Herewards House. People and others told us staff were kind and caring. People and relatives were able to participate in care planning and reviews, but some decisions were made by staff in people’s best interests. People’s privacy and dignity was respected. We made a recommendation regarding the Data Protection Act 1998.

Care plans were personalised and reviewed regularly. There was a satisfactory complaints system in place which included the ability for people and others to escalate complaints to external organisations. The service had no recorded complaints for a considerable period of time.

Staff demonstrated a positive workplace spirit and enjoyed their roles. People and others felt the service was well-led. A small number of audits were conducted to check the safety and quality of care. People who used the service and staff feedback was noted by the management team in the operation of the service. We made a recommendation about the statement of purpose and related statutory notifications.