• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Cottage HomeCare Services

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

38 Doctor Fold Lane, Heywood, Lancashire, OL10 2QE 07887 481290

Provided and run by:
Mrs Jayne Lewis

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

About the service

Cottage HomeCare Services is a homecare agency providing care and support to people living in their own homes and flats. At the time of the inspection the service was supporting 68 people with tasks related to personal hygiene, eating and medication administration.

Who the service is for

The service supports younger and older people some of whom have a diagnosis of dementia, mental health needs or a physical disability. The service was also supporting one person who has a learning disability

Key findings


We carried out this assessment from 25 July to 22 August. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.
We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed autistic people and people with a learning disability respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. We were satisfied that Cottage HomeCare met the expectations of this guidance.
People were supported by enough staff who had the skills and knowledge to support them safely and were recruited safely. Staff received training and regular supervisions, which helped to ensure competency and compliance. However, some refresher training was overdue and further training was required in relation to dementia care.
Accidents and incidents were logged with information about the actions taken to help minimise the risk of further incidents. A complaints file also included learning that could be taken to help drive improvement in the service. Complaints were thoroughly investigated and a detailed letter was provided to the complainant with the outcome.
Risks were assessed and people and their families were involved in this process. There were effective systems in place to safeguard people from abuse.
Medicines were administered safely and risk assessments were in place for those who self-administered. The service used an online system which alerted management to any missed or refused medication which helped to ensure that any issues were dealt with in a timely manner. Medication audits identified areas where improvements could be made.
Care plans were created with the person and their families where appropriate and included relevant information about their care and support needs and interests. Information was gathered in a face-to-face meeting before the care commenced to ensure all important information was recorded. People were supported according to their individual needs, by staff who were caring, compassionate and familiar to them.
People received person centered care and staff liaised with other healthcare professionals to ensure their needs were met. People’s independence was promoted through a variety of aids and adaptations used in their homes to ensure they could access care and support according to their needs and mobility.
Staff were supported through regular meetings and appraisals focusing on delivering high-quality care and treating each person as an individual, ensuring that they felt valued and listened to. The registered manager was supportive and approachable and fostered an open culture where staff felt comfortable to raise concerns and were confident they would be dealt with appropriately.
There was an effective structure within the service ensuring accountability and support. People who used the service and their families spoke highly of the management and how the service was run. We saw evidence of learning and development and a drive to continuously improve the service and ensure everyone received high quality, person-centred care.
 

28 March 2019

During a routine inspection

About the service:

Cottage HomeCare Services is a domiciliary care agency. At the time of our inspection, the service was providing care to 59 people who were living in their own homes.

People’s experience of using this service:

¿ People spoke positively about the care they received. They told us care staff were kind and patent. One person told us, “They are really accommodating and help me out when I get stuck”.

¿ Care plans were person-centred and provided staff with the information they needed to provide care and support in a way that met people’s needs and preferences. The plans were regularly reviewed to take into account any changes in need.

¿ Staff understood their responsibilities to safeguard people from abuse and people told us the care workers who supported them ensured their well-being. They said that staff were vigilant to their safety and that they ensured their security when entering and leaving their property.

¿ The service had systems in place to ensure the safe recruitment of staff. People told us that they were supported by staff who knew them well, and there was sufficient time to meet their needs.

¿ Staff had access to regular training and supervision to ensure they maintained good practice.

¿ Where people required assistance with medicines this was noted in their care plans and people and their relatives told us that staff were careful when administering medicines. Staff were attentive to people’s health needs and liaised with healthcare professionals as necessary.

¿ People told us that they were consulted about how they wanted their care to be delivered, and had consented to care and support. They were offered choices, and services were provided in line with mental capacity legislation.

¿ People told us that staff were generally punctual, but would phone if they were going to be delayed.

¿ The service had a complaints policy and people told us they would feel comfortable raising any concerns with the registered manager, and confident that they would be resolved. We saw complaints were identified, investigated and used to improve the service.

¿ There were processes in place to monitor the safety and quality of the service.

¿ The service had a registered manager in post at the time of our inspection. She was supported by a management team who had the knowledge and experience to operate the service safely and effectively. They demonstrated a good understanding of all aspects of managing the service.

¿ The service met the characteristics of good in all areas. More information is in the full report

Rating at last inspection:

At our last inspection, the service was rated “good”. Our last report was published on 21 September 2016.

Why we inspected:

This was a planned inspection. Our announced inspection started on 28 March ended on 29 March 2019.

Follow up:

Going forward we will continue to monitor this service and plan to inspect in line with our reinspection schedule for services rated Good.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

7 September 2016

During a routine inspection

Cottage Homecare Services provides help and support to people enabling them to remain in their own homes for as long as they wish. The agency offers a variety of services in areas such as assistance with personal care, domestic tasks, help with medication and shopping.

At the time of the inspection there was a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

This was the first rated inspection for this service.

Staff were aware of and had been trained in safeguarding procedures to help protect the health and welfare of people who used the service.

Risk assessments for health needs or environmental hazards helped protect the health and welfare of people who used the service but did not restrict their lifestyles.

Staff were trained in the administration of medicines and managers checked the records to help spot any errors and keep people safe.

People were supported to take a healthy diet if required and staff were trained in food safety.

Plans of care were individual to each person and showed staff had taken account of their wishes. Plans of care were regularly reviewed.

The agency asked for people’s views around how the service was performing to improve the service.

There was a suitable complaints procedure for people to voice their concerns. There had not been any major concerns since the last inspection.

We observed a good rapport between people who used the service and staff. We saw that staff appeared to know people well and understand their needs.

Staff were recruited using current guidelines to help minimise the risk of abuse to people who used the service.

Staff were trained in medicines administration and supported people to take their medicines if it was a part of their care package.

Staff received an induction and were supported when they commenced work to become competent to work with vulnerable people. Staff were well trained and supervised to feel confident within their roles. Staff were encouraged to take further training in health and social care topics.

Management conducted sufficient audits to ensure the service was performing well.

The office was suitable for providing a domiciliary care service and was staffed during office hours. There was an on call service for people to contact out of normal working hours.

People who used the service thought managers were accessible and available to talk to.

Staff were trained in infection prevention and control and issued with personal equipment to help protect the health and welfare of people who used the service.