• Care Home
  • Care home

Priesty Fields Care Home

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

Priesty Fields, Congleton, CW12 4AQ (020) 8866 6533

Provided and run by:
Sandstone Care Cheshire Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile
Important:

We served two warning notice's on Sandstone Care Cheshire Limited on 19 March 2025 for failing to meet the regulations related to safeguarding people from abuse and good governance at Priesty Fields Care Home.

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of assessment:11 July to 4 August 2025, with site visits on 11, 15, 18 and 22 July 2025.The service is a care home providing support for up to 78 people, including older people with nursing needs and those living with dementia. At the time of the inspection 42 people were living at Priesty Fields Care Home.This assessment was to follow up on actions required after the last assessment. The provider was previously in breach of regulations relating to safe care, staffing, premises, safeguarding, fit and proper persons, person-centred care, nutritional needs, good governance and duty of candour. We rated the service as inadequate, and we issued warning notices in relation to safeguarding and governance.

At this assessment we assessed the key questions of safe, caring and well-led. We found the provider had made some improvements and met some of the breaches but remained in breach of regulations related to safe care and treatment, safeguarding and governance. The overall rating for the service has improved to requires improvement.Overall, we found an improving picture, however, we identified ongoing shortfalls in various areas including the assessment and recording of risk, medicines management, identifying and reporting safeguarding concerns and the governance of the service. These shortfalls indicated practice was not always consistent and changes which were in-progress needed to be further embedded and sustained.

Improvements to the service appeared evident since the provider had more recently introduced a new management team. An external consultancy organisation was temporarily supporting the provider to make improvements. Further changes were planned as a new permanent manager and clinical deputy manager had been appointed and were due to start.The management team had focused on improving the culture of the service and ensuring any safeguarding concerns were reported appropriately and lessons were learnt from accidents and incidents. Managers had introduced various systems in identify and address staff performance issues. New staff had been recruited and staff felt better supported through training and supervision. Staff morale was improving, and they said managers would now listen to them.

The provider had made improvements to the safety and cleanliness of the environment. Health and safety checks were undertaken. There was a focus on developing people’s care plans and supporting them with person centred goals.However, the provider’s governance and audits had not effectively identified and addressed all the issues we identified at this assessment. The provider was responsive to our feedback, and they took some immediate actions.

This service has been in Special Measures since 5 June 2025. The provider demonstrated some improvements have been made. The service is no longer rated as inadequate overall or in any of the key questions. Therefore, this service is no longer in Special Measures.We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of assessment: 29 November 2024; 6 December 2024 and 10 January 2025. Priesty Fields Care Home is a residential care home providing both personal and nursing care to up to 78 people. We undertook this assessment because of emerging risk at the service. We assessed all the quality statements. We identified 9 breaches of regulation, including person centred care, consent, safe care and treatment, safeguarding, premises, good governance, staffing, fit and proper persons employed, and duty of candour. People were not safe because staff failed to act without delay to safeguard people from abuse. Risks of injury and harm were not always identified and mitigated. Risks relating to infection prevention and control were not always managed safely. Care was not always provided in accordance with people’s needs, which left them at risk of harm. People and their relatives were involved in care planning but not routinely given access to their care plans. The provider was not always working in accordance with the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). Staff were not always deployed effectively to ensure people’s needs were met in a timely manner. Some staff had not received adequate training. Staff said communication with management was not always effective, and we received mixed feedback on managers being approachable and responsive. Governance systems were inadequate. In instances where Care Quality Commission (CQC) have decided to take civil or criminal enforcement action against a provider, we will publish this information on our website after any representations and/ or appeals have been concluded. This service is being placed in special measures. The purpose of special measures is to ensure that services providing inadequate care make significant improvements. Special measures provide a framework within which we user our enforcement powers in response to inadequate care and provide a timeframe within which providers must improve the quality of the care they provide.